From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:10143 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752225AbYFERyo (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:54:44 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so467592waf.23 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240806051054t26ae5487s531962bf9ebcb2ff@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080605_195447_191478_369185C7) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:54:42 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] rfkill: clarify meaning of rfkill states Cc: "Ivo van Doorn" , "Dan Williams" , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Dmitry Torokhov" In-Reply-To: <1212687773.13044.1256965165@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1212549017-30144-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <1ba2fa240806041607j10841ac0qb11fe0d0b27953d8@mail.gmail.com> <20080605003808.GA16599@khazad-dum.debian.net> <200806051803.43193.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1ba2fa240806050936o383111cepcd6733d1ed205a26@mail.gmail.com> <1212687773.13044.1256965165@webmail.messagingengine.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:36:26 +0300, "Tomas Winkler" said: >> Cannot this be just fixed with ~ sed -s/ON/OFF/g' over the kernel? > > Absolutely NOT! > > You would have patches in flight, not to mention out-of-tree > stuff, that you'd have no idea if they want the old or new meaning. > > Not to mention you'd never know what you forgot to convert, etc. > How many drivers today implement the rfkill interface? I guess no more then 10. Tomas