Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mac80211 dissasociation

Tomas Winkler
2008-09-07T14:51:00Z

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:24 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 01:14 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> >> This series should fix mac problems in disassociation
>> >> There are two basic problems disassociation in current implementation.
>> >> The order of steps in the dissociation flow and missing proper
>> >> disassociation when moving from one AP to another.
>> >
>> > Mind if I adopt this patch series? I've done only slight modifications
>> > so far (the int->bool thing I asked for) and have rebased all the
>> > patches I had already posted on top of it. The arguments to
>> > ieee80211_set_disassoc are changing a lot in my patch series anyway so
>> > I'll just work on top of the bool/bool thing and then fix it up, ok?
>>
>> Don't mind just need to test them properly and update commit messages.
>> Any suggestion how we do that?
>
> I've already changed the commit messages slightly, you can find my
> versions at http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/patches/kernel/all/LATEST/
> (disassoc-part-{1,2,3}.patch). If you want to test those by themselves
> that would probably be useful, and if you want to test my complete mlme
> rewrite I'd appreciate that too, but I'm not done rebasing yet :)

Okay I'll take first the 3 patches then now and I will check the
rewrites after that .
Thanks
Tomas