From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] drivers: wireless: carl9170: shrink carl9170_tx_info
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:17:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2002983.Zu6fLi5xz6@debian64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150314175532.GH14761@breakpoint.cc>
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 06:55:32 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
> Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:37:25 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > its embededded inside rate_driver_data of the ieee80211_tx_info struct,
> > > which in turn is stored in skb->cb[].
> > >
> > > In order to shrink cb, we need to shrink ieee80211_tx_info which means
> > > to downsize all users first.
> > >
> > > Alternatively, one might be able to remove kref but
> > > its less intrusive/simpler to use u32 for timeout handling.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> > > ---
> > u32 jiffies... that's a lot of pointing (well not so much) and really
> > ugly casting (a lot). I guess it would be easier to just use a "per-queue"
> > timeout watchdog like almost everybody else. This way, the driver will
> > be ready for the next skb->cb shrink as well.
> >
> > carl9170_tx_ampdu_timeout can be completely removed.
>
> Maybe, but there is only so much I am willing to do with "compile
> tested only" patches...
well, reinventing jiffies_32 is just a ugly hack and not "intrusive/simpler"
than removing kref here.
Please try again. Don't worry about testing, I'm sure this is not a problem
and someone will test the patches with the hw on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms.
Regards,
Christian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-15 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 15:37 [PATCH next] drivers: wireless: carl9170: shrink carl9170_tx_info Florian Westphal
2015-03-14 11:51 ` Christian Lamparter
2015-03-14 17:55 ` Florian Westphal
2015-03-15 17:17 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2002983.Zu6fLi5xz6@debian64 \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).