linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: d80211: current TKIP hwcrypto implementation seems to be broken
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:55:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702061555.45532.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070205214333.4e77948e@griffin.suse.cz>

On Monday 05 February 2007 21:43, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:44:18 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > We need the phase1 for bcm43xx. We need to upload it to
> > card memory and we need to pass it on every TX on the DMA.
> > 
> > So, currently we receive the phase1 key on the first
> > encrypted TX. That's too late, as we already receive encrypted
> > packets before that. bcm43xx needs the phase1 key (and the iv32)
> > on RX. It uses the one uploaded into the card memory. But it
> > is not uploaded, yet, as we did not TX any encrypted packet.
> > 
> > I'd say the only solution to this is to implement the earlier
> > suggested way of having a library function call to generate
> > the keys. Of course, that needs some bookkeeping about the IVs
> > and stuff.
> > That library function would be called by bcm43xx before any
> > traffic to get an initial phase1 key (and iv32) uploaded.
> 
> What if the key is changed by the user space? You won't know that and
> won't call the library function then. I think it needs to be designed
> in the opposite way - the stack will call a driver's callback.
> 
> Or am I missing something?

Yeah, peobably. I don't really know in detail how
tkip works. I just know that current implementation in
d80211 does not work, as I tried it. ;)

I need to read the specs about it first.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-06 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-04 12:44 d80211: current TKIP hwcrypto implementation seems to be broken Michael Buesch
2007-02-05 20:43 ` Jiri Benc
2007-02-05 21:38   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-05 21:45     ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-05 21:48       ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-06 14:55   ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-02-12 18:30 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-12 21:39   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-12 23:15     ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-12 23:23       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-12 23:54         ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13  0:10           ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13  0:19             ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13  0:28               ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-13  1:08                 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13  1:20                   ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-15 16:58                     ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13  0:33               ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13  1:09                 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-12 23:53     ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-13  0:06       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13  0:16         ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 16:18   ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702061555.45532.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).