From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: d80211: current TKIP hwcrypto implementation seems to be broken
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:55:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702061555.45532.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070205214333.4e77948e@griffin.suse.cz>
On Monday 05 February 2007 21:43, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:44:18 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > We need the phase1 for bcm43xx. We need to upload it to
> > card memory and we need to pass it on every TX on the DMA.
> >
> > So, currently we receive the phase1 key on the first
> > encrypted TX. That's too late, as we already receive encrypted
> > packets before that. bcm43xx needs the phase1 key (and the iv32)
> > on RX. It uses the one uploaded into the card memory. But it
> > is not uploaded, yet, as we did not TX any encrypted packet.
> >
> > I'd say the only solution to this is to implement the earlier
> > suggested way of having a library function call to generate
> > the keys. Of course, that needs some bookkeeping about the IVs
> > and stuff.
> > That library function would be called by bcm43xx before any
> > traffic to get an initial phase1 key (and iv32) uploaded.
>
> What if the key is changed by the user space? You won't know that and
> won't call the library function then. I think it needs to be designed
> in the opposite way - the stack will call a driver's callback.
>
> Or am I missing something?
Yeah, peobably. I don't really know in detail how
tkip works. I just know that current implementation in
d80211 does not work, as I tried it. ;)
I need to read the specs about it first.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-06 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-04 12:44 d80211: current TKIP hwcrypto implementation seems to be broken Michael Buesch
2007-02-05 20:43 ` Jiri Benc
2007-02-05 21:38 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-05 21:45 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-05 21:48 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-06 14:55 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-02-12 18:30 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-12 21:39 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-12 23:15 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-12 23:23 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-12 23:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 0:10 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 0:19 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 0:28 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-13 1:08 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 1:20 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-15 16:58 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 0:33 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 1:09 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-12 23:53 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-13 0:06 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 0:16 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 16:18 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702061555.45532.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).