From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jouni Malinen" <jkm@devicescape.com>,
"Jiri Benc" <jbenc@suse.cz>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: d80211: current TKIP hwcrypto implementation seems to be broken
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:23:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702130023.53271.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240702121515p7edd3682j87070b564cb08897@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 00:15, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> I fetching this from my "dusty" memory so I hope I'm right about it.
> TKIP phase1 one can be precomputed in advance. There's no runtime
Phase1 key changes on iv32 wrap.
> dependency after key exchange.
> Cached keys can be provided by supplicant. Usually u want to keep 2 or
> 3 cached TKIP phase1 for smooth decryption. As in QoS sequence
Hardware (bcm43xx at least) can only have one key at a time.
There's no point in caching, as phase1 key calculation is cheap
and can be done on-the-run. The expensive part it uploading it to HW.
> counters are kept per AC, you might get into gentle state of receiving
> packets for the old key. If you hold more then one phase1 you might
> be able decrypt the packets that doesn't match current phase1 in
> software.
You can generate the new key then. There is no point in wasting memory
by precomputation of the keys.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-12 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-04 12:44 d80211: current TKIP hwcrypto implementation seems to be broken Michael Buesch
2007-02-05 20:43 ` Jiri Benc
2007-02-05 21:38 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-05 21:45 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-05 21:48 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-06 14:55 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-12 18:30 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-12 21:39 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-12 23:15 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-12 23:23 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-02-12 23:54 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 0:10 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 0:19 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 0:28 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-13 1:08 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 1:20 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-15 16:58 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-13 0:33 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 1:09 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-02-12 23:53 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-02-13 0:06 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 0:16 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-13 16:18 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702130023.53271.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jkm@devicescape.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).