From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:39965 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbXCZUjy (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:39:54 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix machine check on PPC for version 1 PHY Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:39:31 +0200 Cc: Larry Finger , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de References: <46067d12.1uF8l72xIYAG6Vyb%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <460730FF.1050603@lwfinger.net> <1174911202.3238.15.camel@pmac.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1174911202.3238.15.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200703262239.31415.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 26 March 2007 14:13, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 21:33 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > > Joseph has fixed the problem in initb5 (the first hunk), but the second hunk is still not in the new > > specs. It was in the previous version in a slightly different form, but was found largely by trial > > and error. > > > > I would prefer that this patch go forward as is so that we don't end up with this bug in the > > released version of 21.6.21. I am in the process of making the initg code match the current specs, > > but that will certainly require more testing than I think we have time to complete before 2.6.21 is > > released. > > FWIW I tried the mac80211 version (with v4 firmware) and saw very > similar machine checks, even after trying to apply the same 'fixes'. logs... -- Greetings Michael.