From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:32865 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933812AbXC1KKX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:10:23 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: found: PHY transmission errors in bcm43xx-mac80211 master mode Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:10:13 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless , Jiri Benc References: <1174988381.5710.7.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1174988381.5710.7.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200703281210.13707.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 27 March 2007 11:39, Johannes Berg wrote: > Hi, > > So I figured out where the PHY transmission errors come from. That's > when the firmware tries to respond to a probe request, apparently the > driver/mac80211/hostapd don't handle probe response offloading and thus > the whole settings for probe responses are invalid, leading to phy > transmission errors. mac80211 or hostapd actually respond to the probe > responses then but it'd be nice if we could actually use the > offloading :) We do upload a probe response template. But I think that there is a bug in that code, too. A TX error sounds like a bad PLCP or something. Maybe wrong packet size given to the ucode. Did the SHM offset with the size actually change? -- Greetings Michael.