Re: OpenBSD bcw: Possible GPL license violation issues

[Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>]

On Thursday 05 April 2007 21:29, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > The way they chose to "notify" Marcus shows a complete lack of  
> > > respect for Marcus.
> > 
> > The way OpenBSD folks used our code was a complete lack of respect
> > for us. Fullstop.
> 
> You refuse to accept it was an accident.  Therefore we refuse to
> accept that your public posting was an accident.

Both exactly right.

> You publically 
> attacked another open source developer for a specific purpose.  You
> are an inhuman asshole, out to make a public fuss about something,
> when you had a choice to tell him in private.

*clap clap clap*
Nice show, Theo. Insulting people is always the way to get an
issue solved.

> You got what you wanted -- the driver has been deleted.

I never said I wanted the driver to be deleted. Re-read the whole
thread please. But switch your "turn the meaning of sentences over" device
off first, please.

> > > As Theo expressed in the thread, there is NO   
> > > DOUBT that they would have notified a corporation privately.  Why  
> > > would you treat an individual, working on the code out of their own  
> > > desire, with less respect?
> > 
> > This is a lie.
> > Read the whole thread again!
> 
> Jason Dixon is a liar because he doubts something?  How can he be a

This sentence is the prove that you don't read mails exactly before
replying. Jason did not "doubt something". He wrote [citing]:
"there is NO DOUBT that they would have notified a corporation privately"

Note the capitalized words.

This is a plain lie. There is no special exception from me to companies.
I already said that in another mail.

> liar if he is stating something he believes?  Let me rephrase it: He
> believes you would treat a company better than you treated Marcus.
> 
> Where's the lie?

-- 
Greetings Michael.