From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 09:13:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070526091309.0af20971.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705261750.48816.mb@bu3sch.de>
On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:48 +0200 Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I am going to ignore Uwe from now on. It's simply impossible
> to debug the problem the way he is responding.
> Well, I'm not the first person in the Linux community adding
> him to the killfile, ... .
Well yes, there are some personality issues here ;) But the main thing is
to struggle on and fix this bug, wherever it lies.
> I ask to try wireless-dev, as the driver works perfectly fine
> for me there, but he refuses to try it, too. So I'm stuck.
I don't think he knows how to obtain it.
Uwe, http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-wireless.patch.gz is the current
wireless tree. That's a patch against 2.6.22-rc3. Could you please test
that? If that works then we know that the bug probably lies outside the
b44 driver (or it was subsequently fixed).
> I already tried your -mm kernel, but it crashes on my machine
> for other reasons. (Yeah, I should look into them, too :P )
err, please do. Just the oops trace would be a start.
> Andrew, is it possible that the breakage was introduced in the
> merge process somehow? Didn't the patch apply cleanly? Are there
> other changes to b44 I should know about in your tree?
Only git-wireless.net modifies b44.c but if we're having IRQ assignment
problems then we'd need to look elsewhere. I guess you could diff
rc2-mm1's b44.c against the expected version.
> If it is really impossible to debug this problem, I'd like to
> suggest you to drop the b44-ssb port completely.
Well we don't know if that'll fix it.
I believe that Uwe said that reverting the b44.c changes from rc2-mm1 fixes
things for him? Odd, but it still doesn't rule out acip/pci/platform
changes as being the cause.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-26 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070524195616.234280@gmx.net>
2007-05-24 20:06 ` BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400) Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 21:16 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 13:16 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:12 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:20 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:59 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 14:52 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 15:59 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 16:23 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 18:48 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-25 19:40 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 5:00 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 9:39 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-26 10:40 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:36 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 15:52 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:50 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:13 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-26 16:20 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:46 ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 16:21 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:26 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:40 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:04 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 17:18 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:24 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 18:03 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 19:38 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:57 ` Larry Finger
2007-05-26 20:22 ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 20:33 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:00 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:41 ` Benoit Boissinot
2007-05-26 18:46 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:58 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:14 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:19 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:39 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:49 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 21:32 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:52 ` Dan Williams
2007-05-26 22:16 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:58 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:04 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 12:12 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:14 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 22:42 ` David Miller
2007-05-25 16:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-25 18:42 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 10:46 Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 13:41 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070526091309.0af20971.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxi@daemonizer.de \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).