From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 20:03:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705262003.17403.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705261924.33802.uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:24:33 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 19:18 schrieben Sie:
> > On Saturday 26 May 2007 19:04:04 Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > > Yes, sure! But the help text is very unlucky and humble, and it is not
> > > clear enough in the sense of being distinctive enough, just clear and
> > > comprehensive.
> >
> > Why don't you simply submit a patch to change the helptext then?
> > I'm not sure why you refuse to DO anything about the "mess", but
> > instead keep poking me that I am responsible somehow to fix it up
> > for you...
>
> I need exception examples for doing so. What are the exception examples?
>
> Apart from that you have don nothing except than guessing around.
Admit it. You don't know how debugging is done in the real world.
Debugging _IS_ guessing around.
> Now here comes the LAST proof that your code is buggy:
>
> A. It's not mm-implementation
> B. It's not user behaviour or fault
> C. It's not an ACPI issue
>
> BUT ONE AND ONLY:
>
> D. It's your code that is buggy, without any doubt!
Blahblah. Did you even read the mail I CCed to you?
It "proves" (to use your wording) the exact opposite.
> OK, went Andrew's path: patched 2.6.22-rc3 with wireless tree:
>
> Result: The NIC driver b44 and ssb are loaded correctly, but refuse to work
> (no network communication possible).
Ok, please take git and get my development tree and try with that:
git clone http://bu3sch.de/git/wireless-dev.git
It's based on 2.6.22-rc1 and it works fine for me.
> dmesg:
>
...
Ok, config and dmesg looks OK to me, now.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-26 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070524195616.234280@gmx.net>
2007-05-24 20:06 ` BUG in 2.6.22-rc2-mm1: NIC module b44.c broken (Broadcom 4400) Andrew Morton
2007-05-24 21:16 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 13:16 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:12 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:20 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 13:59 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 14:52 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 15:59 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-25 16:23 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-25 18:48 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-25 19:40 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 5:00 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 9:39 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-26 10:40 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:36 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 15:52 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 15:50 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 16:20 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:46 ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 16:21 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:26 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 16:40 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:04 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 17:18 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 17:24 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 18:03 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-05-26 18:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-26 19:38 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:57 ` Larry Finger
2007-05-26 20:22 ` Francois Romieu
2007-05-26 20:33 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:00 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:41 ` Benoit Boissinot
2007-05-26 18:46 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 18:58 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:14 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:19 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:39 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 19:49 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 21:32 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:52 ` Dan Williams
2007-05-26 22:16 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 21:58 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 19:04 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 12:12 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-26 16:14 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-26 22:42 ` David Miller
2007-05-25 16:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-25 18:42 ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 10:46 Uwe Bugla
2007-05-27 13:41 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705262003.17403.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxi@daemonizer.de \
--cc=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).