From: andy@warmcat.com
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>
Subject: [PATCH Try#9 1/4] mac80211: Monitor mode radiotap injection docs
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:21:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070611152210.169114424@warmcat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070611152120.078733592@warmcat.com
From: Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>
---
Documentation/networking/mac80211-injection.txt | 59 +++++++++++++++++
Documentation/networking/radiotap-headers.txt | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
Index: wireless-dev/Documentation/networking/mac80211-injection.txt
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ wireless-dev/Documentation/networking/mac80211-injection.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+How to use packet injection with mac80211
+=========================================
+
+mac80211 now allows arbitrary packets to be injected down any Monitor Mode
+interface from userland. The packet you inject needs to be composed in the
+following format:
+
+ [ radiotap header ]
+ [ ieee80211 header ]
+ [ payload ]
+
+The radiotap format is discussed in
+./Documentation/networking/radiotap-headers.txt.
+
+Despite 13 radiotap argument types are currently defined, most only make sense
+to appear on received packets. Currently three kinds of argument are used by
+the injection code, although it knows to skip any other arguments that are
+present (facilitating replay of captured radiotap headers directly):
+
+ - IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_RATE - u8 arg in 500kbps units (0x02 --> 1Mbps)
+
+ - IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_ANTENNA - u8 arg, 0x00 = ant1, 0x01 = ant2
+
+ - IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_DBM_TX_POWER - u8 arg, dBm
+
+Here is an example valid radiotap header defining these three parameters
+
+ 0x00, 0x00, // <-- radiotap version
+ 0x0b, 0x00, // <- radiotap header length
+ 0x04, 0x0c, 0x00, 0x00, // <-- bitmap
+ 0x6c, // <-- rate
+ 0x0c, //<-- tx power
+ 0x01 //<-- antenna
+
+The ieee80211 header follows immediately afterwards, looking for example like
+this:
+
+ 0x08, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
+ 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
+ 0x13, 0x22, 0x33, 0x44, 0x55, 0x66,
+ 0x13, 0x22, 0x33, 0x44, 0x55, 0x66,
+ 0x10, 0x86
+
+Then lastly there is the payload.
+
+After composing the packet contents, it is sent by send()-ing it to a logical
+mac80211 interface that is in Monitor mode. Libpcap can also be used,
+(which is easier than doing the work to bind the socket to the right
+interface), along the following lines:
+
+ ppcap = pcap_open_live(szInterfaceName, 800, 1, 20, szErrbuf);
+...
+ r = pcap_inject(ppcap, u8aSendBuffer, nLength);
+
+You can also find sources for a complete inject test applet here:
+
+http://penumbra.warmcat.com/_twk/tiki-index.php?page=packetspammer
+
+Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>
Index: wireless-dev/Documentation/networking/radiotap-headers.txt
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ wireless-dev/Documentation/networking/radiotap-headers.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+How to use radiotap headers
+===========================
+
+Pointer to the radiotap include file
+------------------------------------
+
+Radiotap headers are variable-length and extensible, you can get most of the
+information you need to know on them from:
+
+./include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h
+
+This document gives an overview and warns on some corner cases.
+
+
+Structure of the header
+-----------------------
+
+There is a fixed portion at the start which contains a u32 bitmap that defines
+if the possible argument associated with that bit is present or not. So if b0
+of the it_present member of ieee80211_radiotap_header is set, it means that
+the header for argument index 0 (IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_TSFT) is present in the
+argument area.
+
+ < 8-byte ieee80211_radiotap_header >
+ [ <possible argument bitmap extensions ... > ]
+ [ <argument> ... ]
+
+At the moment there are only 13 possible argument indexes defined, but in case
+we run out of space in the u32 it_present member, it is defined that b31 set
+indicates that there is another u32 bitmap following (shown as "possible
+argument bitmap extensions..." above), and the start of the arguments is moved
+forward 4 bytes each time.
+
+Note also that the it_len member __le16 is set to the total number of bytes
+covered by the ieee80211_radiotap_header and any arguments following.
+
+
+Requirements for arguments
+--------------------------
+
+After the fixed part of the header, the arguments follow for each argument
+index whose matching bit is set in the it_present member of
+ieee80211_radiotap_header.
+
+ - the arguments are all stored little-endian!
+
+ - the argument payload for a given argument index has a fixed size. So
+ IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_TSFT being present always indicates an 8-byte argument is
+ present. See the comments in ./include/net/ieee80211_radiotap.h for a nice
+ breakdown of all the argument sizes
+
+ - the arguments must be aligned to a boundary of the argument size using
+ padding. So a u16 argument must start on the next u16 boundary if it isn't
+ already on one, a u32 must start on the next u32 boundary and so on.
+
+ - "alignment" is relative to the start of the ieee80211_radiotap_header, ie,
+ the first byte of the radiotap header. The absolute alignment of that first
+ byte isn't defined. So even if the whole radiotap header is starting at, eg,
+ address 0x00000003, still the first byte of the radiotap header is treated as
+ 0 for alignment purposes.
+
+ - The arguments for a given argument index can be a compound of multiple types
+ together. For example IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_CHANNEL has an argument payload
+ consisting of two u16s of total length 4. When this happens, the padding
+ rule is applied dealing with a u16, NOT dealing with a 4-byte single entity.
+
+
+Example valid radiotap header
+-----------------------------
+
+ 0x00, 0x00, // <-- radiotap version + pad byte
+ 0x0b, 0x00, // <- radiotap header length
+ 0x04, 0x0c, 0x00, 0x00, // <-- bitmap
+ 0x6c, // <-- rate (in 500kHz units)
+ 0x0c, //<-- tx power
+ 0x01 //<-- antenna
+
+
+Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-11 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-11 15:21 [PATCH Try#9 0/4] Radiotap injection for Monitor Mode andy
2007-06-11 15:21 ` andy [this message]
2007-06-11 15:21 ` [PATCH Try#9 2/4] mac80211: Define present bitmap extend bit mask andy
2007-06-11 15:21 ` [PATCH Try#9 3/4] cfg80211: Radiotap parser andy
2007-06-12 8:09 ` Michael Wu
2007-06-11 15:21 ` [PATCH Try#9 4/4] mac80211: Monitor mode radiotap-based packet injection andy
2007-06-12 8:23 ` Michael Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070611152210.169114424@warmcat.com \
--to=andy@warmcat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).