From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:44:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070618184436.GC17479@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1182188327.22149.5.camel@xo-28-0B-88.localdomain>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:38:47PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:13 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I suspect that the probability of your proposal succeeding would be increased
> > > if you could prepare a patch...
>
> Applied to upstream-fixes branch of libertas-2.6 which is destined for
> 2.6.22; I hope you don't mind that I just added the Signed-off-by for
> you.
Adding a signed off line for a patch that purely removes codes seems
rather pointless to me, but feel free to add it if you care.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-13 17:58 libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211 Johannes Berg
2007-06-14 17:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-14 17:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-14 18:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-14 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-14 18:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-14 22:22 ` Dan Williams
2007-06-14 22:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-14 22:55 ` Dan Williams
2007-06-14 19:09 ` John W. Linville
2007-06-14 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-14 20:08 ` John W. Linville
2007-06-17 4:46 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-06 15:40 ` Javier Cardona
2007-07-06 16:08 ` Dan Williams
2007-07-10 14:56 ` John W. Linville
2007-07-10 15:18 ` John W. Linville
2007-06-18 17:38 ` Dan Williams
2007-06-18 18:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-06-18 18:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-06-14 20:03 ` Holger Schurig
2007-06-14 22:48 ` Dan Williams
2007-06-15 18:42 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070618184436.GC17479@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).