From: David Gibson <hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23 3/3] [wireless] orinoco: create a Kconfig option for Prism2
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:20:08 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070723062008.GG3272@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185171040.2108.46.camel@dv>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:10:40AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 11:42 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > Create an option to disable support for Prism devices in orinoco driver which
> > > disabled the IDs for the PCMCIA module and creates a Kconfig dependency for
> > > the Prism PCI modules.
> >
> > I very much dislike this being a compile time only CONFIG option. A
> > module parameter which enables or disables the device IDs would be
> > much nicer, if possible. It can default to off (orinoco will not
> > claim Prism cards).
>
> I'm afraid it's not possible. There is only one device map in the
> driver, and it's read by depmod to generate module map tables.
Ah, yes. Bugger :(
>
> If the run-time device table is different from the compile-time table,
> this would be really confusing. Either the module would be loaded to
> support the device but would refuse to do so, or the module would need
> to be loaded manually for some devices, even if no other module is
> available to support the device.
>
> Besides, orinoco_pci would become useless by default.
>
> Please see my message. For TMD bridges, we don't know the firmware
> flavor before we know the firmware version. For PLX bridges, we can
> read the CIS first and match the PCMCIA table, but it would need to be
> done manually, without the PCMCIA code.
>
> I don't see any clear solution without some kind of the device handover
> from Orinoco to hostap or vice versa.
>
> I would probably start with cutting Agere and Symbol devices from
> hostap, which is a much more clear-cut case than cutting working Prism
> support from Orinoco.
Hrm. Eck.
I remember once in the distant past Jouni was talking about a possible
merge of hostap and orinoco, starting with the low-level device
manipulation stuff (hermes.c, basically). But nothing ever came of it.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-22 13:17 [PATCH 2.6.23 3/3] [wireless] orinoco: create a Kconfig option for Prism2 Faidon Liambotis
2007-07-22 17:14 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-23 22:07 ` Faidon Liambotis
2007-07-25 5:30 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-25 6:19 ` Faidon Liambotis
2007-07-25 16:32 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-08-01 3:33 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-08-01 5:55 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-23 1:42 ` David Gibson
2007-07-23 6:10 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-07-23 6:20 ` David Gibson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070723062008.GG3272@localhost.localdomain \
--to=hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paravoid@debian.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).