linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
To: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
Cc: Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recent linux-wireless git changes have broken my prism54pci card
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:29:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708142029.20057.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C1638C.7070704@hhs.nl>

On Tuesday, 14. August 2007, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >  
> > 1. Which p54 firmware do you use? (It "must" be 2.7.0.0 for pci/cardbus)
> 2.4.12.0, extracted from the window driver for my card, any later version will 
> cause the driver to fail to load with: "Error cannot read eeprom!"

uhh, that's a pity... Well, I'm thinking about to get the FW then. The problem is that I don't have the
necessary equipment "here" for debugging (I am abroad with my old laptop and a minipci prism54 card...)

Anyway, could you please verify that the firmware at 
http://daemonizer.de/prism54/prism54-fw/fw-softmac/2.4.12.0.arm is the same one you have?
Or does it "differ"? 

> 
> > 2. What's your "average" txrate and Link Signal Level / Link Quality with and without the patches.
> >    (see iwconfig)
> See attached logs
> 
Your average speed is in the very low MBit/s and your normal Link Signal Level is only about 
40/100 (~ -80 dbm! ) ?! (The equation is roughly (rssi / 2) - 100 = dbm)

Something is fishy: take a look at the "not working" scan-13-6.  Signal level is about 62/100 
(~ -69 dbm! => much better! Did you move the laptop, or is this high value really reproducible?)

> > 3. what brand/type of AP do you have? 
> A davolink DV-201AMR its an embedded Linux device using the BCM6348 chipset,

hmm, a embedded linux? do you have a ssh/telnet access to the router? Maybe the
syslogs / dmesg gives us a "hint" why it won't connect.  
(BTW: does your router really only support the weak WEP encryptions?)

> 
> > -> what does the beacon frame look like? (or: if you don't have a
> > wlan sniffer / monitor, just run: iwlist wlanX scan )
> See logs
> 
> > 4. Can you recompile the mac80211 layer with debug options and look for
> > something like ethX: STA XX:YY:ZZ:AA:BB:CC Average rate: VVV ... in your syslogs?
> 
> See logs

phy4: not handling 0x02 type control frame.
=> It's a bit strange that you got one, it's probably because of the 2.4.12.0 Firmware.

wlan0: switched to short barker preamble.
Well, that's probably the reason why your connection always "dropped".
could you please replace all "IEEE80211_RATE_CCK_2" in p54common.h
with "IEEE80211_RATE_CCK" and report back?

> 
> > 5. are they any suspicious dmesg outputs when the "network" stops/dies?
> > 
> 
> Nope.
Yep, none!


I'll see if I can post you a "debug" driver, when I'm back at home. I'm afraid it's not
possible right now...

> 
> I've attached a tarbal with logs the FC7test logs are the logs from the Fedora 
> 7 test kernel which I normally use, as that works well.
> 
> The rest is based on a F-8 test kernel which contains a wireless-dev snapshot 
> from 26 jul 2007. The dates are dates of git checkouts from prism54common.{c,h}
> the -common one has the speed changes to prism54common.h reversed, because 
> otherwise connectivity is lost as explained.
> 
k. Do you have another wifi card that can perform wifi sniffs? (just as an option)

> I hope this helps.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 

Thanks,
	Chr


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-14 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-13  5:50 Recent linux-wireless git changes have broken my prism54pci card Hans de Goede
2007-08-13  6:18 ` Michael Wu
2007-08-13  6:33   ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-13  6:46     ` Andy Green
2007-08-13  7:49       ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-13  7:58         ` Michael Wu
2007-08-13  8:05           ` Andy Green
2007-08-13 11:58           ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-13 20:14             ` Michael Wu
2007-08-13 22:25               ` Chr
2007-08-14  8:10                 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-14 18:29                   ` Chr [this message]
2007-08-20  0:44                   ` Chr
2007-08-20  2:32                     ` Larry Finger
2007-08-20  7:52                     ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-20 11:51                       ` Chr
2007-08-20 12:17                         ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-20 22:14                           ` Chr
2007-08-23 11:24                         ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-23 14:43                           ` Chr
2007-08-23 14:36                             ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-23 21:52                             ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-23 23:00                               ` Chr
2007-08-24  9:45                                 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-28 19:32                                   ` Chr
2007-08-30  5:52                                     ` Michael Wu
2007-08-30 11:16                                       ` Chr
2007-08-31 21:27                                       ` [PATCH 1/2] p54: various fixes Chr
2007-08-31 21:27                                       ` [PATCH 2/2] p54: disable QoS on older firmwares Chr
2007-09-01  4:58                                         ` Michael Wu
2007-09-01 16:54                                           ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Chr
2007-08-13 13:14       ` Recent linux-wireless git changes have broken my prism54pci card Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200708142029.20057.chunkeey@web.de \
    --to=chunkeey@web.de \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).