From: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
To: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
Cc: Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recent linux-wireless git changes have broken my prism54pci card
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:44:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708200244.22841.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C1638C.7070704@hhs.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 675 bytes --]
On Tuesday, 14. August 2007, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hans,
Any updates? Or are you on holiday?
I've prepared a patch, which should theoretically lower the excessive retry count.
however I don't think it will magically solve anything...
OT: Michael/anyone else:
1. Do you know why the rate algorithm (rc80211_simple) starts with the lowest speed?
or is this really only a p54 bug?
2. Is there any way to get a station aid (in ap mode) and dtim period
without lots of castings or "new variables" in struct ieee80211_tx_control?
I really need them for AP mode (yes, I have a "proof of concept" for it,
the hardest thing was to compile hostapd ;-) ).
Thanks,
Chr.
[-- Attachment #2: p54-tx-status-is-not-always-necessary.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2156 bytes --]
diff -Nurp a/drivers/net/wireless/p54common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/p54common.c
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/p54common.c 2007-08-18 20:44:04.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/p54common.c 2007-08-20 02:20:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -315,9 +315,11 @@ static void p54_rx_frame_sent(struct iee
struct p54_control_hdr *hdr = (struct p54_control_hdr *) skb->data;
struct p54_frame_sent_hdr *payload = (struct p54_frame_sent_hdr *) hdr->data;
struct sk_buff *entry = (struct sk_buff *) priv->tx_queue.next;
+ struct p54_control_hdr *entry_hdr;
+ struct p54_tx_control_allocdata *entry_data;
u32 addr = le32_to_cpu(hdr->req_id) - 0x70;
struct memrecord *range = NULL;
- u32 freed = 0;
+ u32 freed = 0, pad = 0;
u32 last_addr = priv->rx_start;
while (entry != (struct sk_buff *)&priv->tx_queue) {
@@ -339,15 +341,27 @@ static void p54_rx_frame_sent(struct iee
memcpy(&status.control, range->control,
sizeof(status.control));
kfree(range->control);
- if (!payload->status)
- status.flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STATUS_ACK;
- else
- status.excessive_retries = 1;
- status.retry_count = payload->retries - 1;
- status.ack_signal = le16_to_cpu(payload->ack_rssi);
- skb_pull(entry, sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(struct p54_tx_control_allocdata));
priv->tx_stats.data[status.control.queue].len--;
- ieee80211_tx_status_irqsafe(dev, entry, &status);
+
+ if (status.control.flags & IEEE80211_TXCTL_REQ_TX_STATUS) {
+ entry_hdr = (struct p54_control_hdr *) entry->data;
+ entry_data = (struct p54_tx_control_allocdata *) entry_hdr->data;
+ if (entry_hdr->magic1 == cpu_to_le16(0x4010))
+ pad = entry_data->align[0];
+ else
+ pad = 0;
+
+ if (!payload->status)
+ status.flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STATUS_ACK;
+ else
+ status.excessive_retries = 1;
+ status.retry_count = payload->retries - 1;
+ status.ack_signal = le16_to_cpu(payload->ack_rssi);
+ skb_pull(entry, sizeof(*hdr) + pad + sizeof(*entry_data));
+ ieee80211_tx_status_irqsafe(dev, entry, &status);
+ } else
+ dev_kfree_skb_irq(entry);
+
break;
} else
last_addr = range->end_addr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-13 5:50 Recent linux-wireless git changes have broken my prism54pci card Hans de Goede
2007-08-13 6:18 ` Michael Wu
2007-08-13 6:33 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-13 6:46 ` Andy Green
2007-08-13 7:49 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-13 7:58 ` Michael Wu
2007-08-13 8:05 ` Andy Green
2007-08-13 11:58 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-13 20:14 ` Michael Wu
2007-08-13 22:25 ` Chr
2007-08-14 8:10 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-14 18:29 ` Chr
2007-08-20 0:44 ` Chr [this message]
2007-08-20 2:32 ` Larry Finger
2007-08-20 7:52 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-20 11:51 ` Chr
2007-08-20 12:17 ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-20 22:14 ` Chr
2007-08-23 11:24 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-23 14:43 ` Chr
2007-08-23 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-23 21:52 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-23 23:00 ` Chr
2007-08-24 9:45 ` Hans de Goede
2007-08-28 19:32 ` Chr
2007-08-30 5:52 ` Michael Wu
2007-08-30 11:16 ` Chr
2007-08-31 21:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] p54: various fixes Chr
2007-08-31 21:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] p54: disable QoS on older firmwares Chr
2007-09-01 4:58 ` Michael Wu
2007-09-01 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Chr
2007-08-13 13:14 ` Recent linux-wireless git changes have broken my prism54pci card Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708200244.22841.chunkeey@web.de \
--to=chunkeey@web.de \
--cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).