From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:45:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070830134506.GB2778@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070829204529.66ce1bcb@the-village.bc.nu>
On 30-08-2007 13:59, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 15:13 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>
>> How about asking for changes to be dual-licenced too ?
>
> In theory, that could work, but in practice relying on functions that
> the Linux kernel offers in GPLv2-only headers etc. will make the result
> GPLv2 anyway, and disentangling it would be a nightmare.
>
Why?
Very good point, but, in my opinion, it should be still resonable for
both sides: it simply means such changes are mostly unusable for the
other side, but nobody is going to waste time for marking all these
places, or care about suing if accidentally the changes, after some
adaptation, are usable for the other side. Unless you think or know
that "#include xyz" or "print_linux_way()" should add more than these
(maybe unusable) words or lines only?
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-30 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-28 15:58 [PATCH 1/5] Net: ath5k, split hw into hw, phy and initvals Jiri Slaby
2007-08-28 16:22 ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-28 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-28 17:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-28 17:33 ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-28 17:47 ` Larry Finger
2007-08-28 21:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2007-08-30 1:50 ` Nick Kossifidis
2007-08-30 12:38 ` John W. Linville
2007-09-01 3:12 ` Nick Kossifidis
[not found] ` <280951420471148977@pripojeni.net>
2007-08-28 17:13 ` [PATCH 5/5] Net: ath5k, kconfig changes Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-30 1:38 ` Nick Kossifidis
2007-08-30 12:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-30 12:36 ` John W. Linville
2007-08-30 22:18 ` Nick Kossifidis
2007-09-01 5:58 ` Nick Kossifidis
2007-08-31 11:58 ` Dan Williams
2007-08-31 13:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-31 14:32 ` Dan Williams
[not found] ` <7515194658758617@pripojeni.net>
2007-08-28 17:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2 Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-28 20:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2007-08-29 17:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-29 18:01 ` Jon Smirl
2007-08-29 18:28 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-29 19:33 ` Jon Smirl
2007-08-29 19:37 ` Michael Buesch
2007-08-30 8:26 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-30 8:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-08-29 19:45 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-30 13:45 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-08-30 13:02 ` David Newall
2007-08-29 9:59 ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-29 10:35 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-08-29 13:13 ` Xavier Bestel
2007-08-30 11:59 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <2440910618305782004@pripojeni.net>
2007-08-30 12:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] Net: ath5k, use int as retval John W. Linville
2007-09-01 20:08 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-02 15:55 ` Nick Kossifidis
2007-09-03 6:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-09-03 13:37 ` Nick Kossifidis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070830134506.GB2778@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).