linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: jt@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc regression: bcm43xx does not work after commit 4cf92a3c
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:04:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709182004.20227.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070918174202.GB1466@bougret.hpl.hp.com>

On Tuesday 18 September 2007 19:42:02 Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:33:56PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > John,
> > 
> > Yoshifuji Hideaki reported that commit 4cf92a3c broke the bcm43xx driver. I was able to duplicate
> > the problem with WEP encryption and ifconfig control of the device. The problem does not happen with
> > WPA or when using NetworkManager with WEP.
> > 
> > This patch was supposed to be a fix for the bug reported at
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8686; however, it does not.
> > 
> > This commit should be reverted before 2.6.23 is released.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Larry
> 
> 	Larry,
> 
> 	Could you be more explicit ? Reverting the patch will just
> bring back the old bug, and the old code was obviously wrong. I don't
> like the idea of trading one bug for another bug. It looks to me like
> nobody knows what's exactly happening in the driver and we are just
> trying random fixes and see what breaks.
> 	Could you figure out what's exactly happening and make a
> proper fix ?

Indeed. The patch does fix a bug. So reverting it is not really
an option. I'm not sure how that patch can introduce such breakage, though.
It must be some special ordering of wext calls that trigger this.
It might be that there's another bug similiar to this one breaking
the state machine.
Can you monitor if all needed steps are properly done (assoc, etc...)
to get a WEP connection? If not, where does it fail?

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-18 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070917.042418.19962472.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
2007-09-17 16:54 ` 2.6.23-rc regression: bcm43xx does not work after commit 4cf92a3c Jean Tourrilhes
2007-09-17 17:27   ` Larry Finger
2007-09-18  4:33   ` Larry Finger
2007-09-18 17:42     ` Jean Tourrilhes
2007-09-18 18:04       ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-09-19  3:03       ` Larry Finger
2007-09-19 16:32         ` Jean Tourrilhes
2007-09-25  2:50           ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-09-25  3:06             ` Larry Finger
2007-09-25  3:29               ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2007-09-27 12:05                 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200709182004.20227.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).