From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:48436 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757071AbXISSjs (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:39:48 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Ivo van Doorn Subject: Re: Please pull 'rt2x00' branch of wireless-2.6 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:36:59 +0200 Cc: David Miller , linville@tuxdriver.com, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <20070918213202.GJ4940@tuxdriver.com> <20070919.112137.48806758.davem@davemloft.net> <200709192048.00741.IvDoorn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200709192048.00741.IvDoorn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200709192036.59443.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:47:59 Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Wednesday 19 September 2007, David Miller wrote: > > From: Ivo van Doorn > > Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:31:19 +0200 > > > > > Because I am indeed not really happy with this early merge, but I'll do my > > > best to resolve the last outstanding bugs as soon as possible. > > > > Relax :-) > > :) > > > A merge upstream doesn't mean "bug free", it means "significantly > > better than no driver at all" and that is undoubtedly the case > > here. > > Well I am happy rt2x00 is being considered good enough for upstream already, > but I have the habbit of wanting things bug-free before pushing it further upstream. > > Well most users are happy with current rt2x00 version anyway, > so the remaining issues probably aren't that big anyway. (Except for the 2 panics, > which should be resolved soon anyway) ;) Well, you have nothing to lose, basically. It's impossible for you to create a regression. So everything is fine, even if it's buggy and doesn't work at all. ;) -- Greetings Michael.