From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull 'z1211' branch of wireless-2.6
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:11:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709221411.12128.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070922094800.GB12327@deine-taler.de>
On Saturday 22 September 2007 11:48:00 Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> A real high-quality driver will require Johannes' proposed
> mac80211 driver interface changes to be merged and TX
> confirmations handled in a way, that the semantics can really be
> supported by the driver. (Michael Buesh's patch is taping over the
> issue.)
No it is not. It is fixing the issue. It fixes the following issues:
* You must ignore the Txstat-requested bit in the driver.
* You must report bad frames with the excessive_retries set.
The issue you are (most likely) talking about is that we can not
reliably tell whether a frame was good in the driver. That is a different
issue completely seperate from the two points above, which my patch fixes.
With my patch rate-controlling correctly works. Without it does not.
If you find a way to fix the reliable-detection-of-good-TX issue, that's
another good fix. But I think it's not release critical, because the
device works with the current "guessing-around" code. But without the two
points above fixed, it does not correctly work at all (unless you manually
tune to the best rate each time you move the machine).
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-22 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 18:10 Please pull 'z1211' branch of wireless-2.6 John W. Linville
2007-09-19 18:59 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 19:23 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-19 19:56 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 20:12 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 22:08 ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-19 22:14 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 22:27 ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-19 22:32 ` David Miller
2007-09-20 13:47 ` John W. Linville
2007-09-20 14:28 ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-20 16:37 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-20 16:40 ` Johannes Berg
2007-09-22 9:48 ` Ulrich Kunitz
2007-09-22 12:11 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-09-22 14:42 ` Ulrich Kunitz
2007-09-22 14:47 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-19 22:12 ` Daniel Drake
2007-09-20 13:28 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200709221411.12128.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kune@deine-taler.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).