* [PATCH] libertas: fix "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer" sparse warnings
@ 2007-10-08 9:41 Holger Schurig
2007-10-08 9:47 ` Holger Schurig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Holger Schurig @ 2007-10-08 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libertas-dev, linux-wireless, Dan Williams
Subject says it all.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Index: libertas-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
===================================================================
--- libertas-2.6.orig/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c
2007-10-08 12:40:31.000000000 +0200
+++ libertas-2.6/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/scan.c 2007-10-08
12:40:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int wlan_scan_channel_list(wlan_p
lbs_deb_enter(LBS_DEB_ASSOC);
- if (pscancfgout == 0 || pchantlvout == 0 || pscanchanlist == 0)
{
+ if (pscancfgout == NULL || pchantlvout == NULL || pscanchanlist
== NULL) {
lbs_deb_scan("Scan: Null detect: %p, %p, %p\n",
pscancfgout, pchantlvout, pscanchanlist);
return -1;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libertas: fix "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer" sparse warnings
2007-10-08 9:41 [PATCH] libertas: fix "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer" sparse warnings Holger Schurig
@ 2007-10-08 9:47 ` Holger Schurig
2007-10-08 9:56 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Holger Schurig @ 2007-10-08 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless
Hmm, I had "wordwrap" turned on :-(
checkpatch.pl barks on this patch anyway, because of the
ridiculus 80 columns restriction it wants to impose. Should I
rephrase the patch because of this or just ignore this
checkpatch warning?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libertas: fix "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer" sparse warnings
2007-10-08 9:47 ` Holger Schurig
@ 2007-10-08 9:56 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2007-10-08 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Holger Schurig; +Cc: linux-wireless
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 411 bytes --]
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 11:47 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
> checkpatch.pl barks on this patch anyway, because of the
> ridiculus 80 columns restriction it wants to impose. Should I
> rephrase the patch because of this or just ignore this
> checkpatch warning?
Personally, I'd prefer it written as "extended booleans" anyway:
+ if (!pscancfgout || !pchantlvout || !pscanchanlist)
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-08 9:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-08 9:41 [PATCH] libertas: fix "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer" sparse warnings Holger Schurig
2007-10-08 9:47 ` Holger Schurig
2007-10-08 9:56 ` Johannes Berg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).