From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.187]:2677 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751163AbXJ0O0I (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:26:08 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z23so1069243fkz for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:26:06 -0700 (PDT) To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] Please pull 'upstream' branch of rt2x00 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:45:37 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200710271334.34192.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20071027124735.GA16222@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20071027124735.GA16222@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200710271645.37715.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20071027_152612_645296_BEA24BBE) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 27 October 2007, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > Here is the 2.0.12 release of rt2x00. > > I noticed you only pulled 2 patches from the 2.0.11 release, > > and I don't know why you dropped the remaining patches. > > This means that this pull requests also contains the remaining > > 2.0.11 patches... > > I haven't dropped them. I'll be merging them for 2.6.25. The patches > that got merged were sent as fixes for 2.6.24. Ah ok. Thanks. Ivo