From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:56359 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756122AbXJ0QA0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:00:26 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1011483nfb for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT) To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] Please pull 'upstream' branch of rt2x00 Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:19:52 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200710271334.34192.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20071027124735.GA16222@tuxdriver.com> <200710271645.37715.IvDoorn@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200710271645.37715.IvDoorn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200710271819.52347.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20071027_170037_267572_04574C4F) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Saturday 27 October 2007, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Saturday 27 October 2007, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > > > Here is the 2.0.12 release of rt2x00. > > > I noticed you only pulled 2 patches from the 2.0.11 release, > > > and I don't know why you dropped the remaining patches. > > > This means that this pull requests also contains the remaining > > > 2.0.11 patches... > > > > I haven't dropped them. I'll be merging them for 2.6.25. The patches > > that got merged were sent as fixes for 2.6.24. > > Ah ok. Thanks. Btw, is there any branch in wireless-2.6 which in this case contains all pending patches? (So those that also includes the patches which will be merged for the next kernel). I could use that branch to update rt2x00.git from. Ivo