From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/T V2] b43: Fix Radio On/Off LED action
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:13:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711281713.02919.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474D83BF.7000102@lwfinger.net>
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 16:05:35 Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> >
> > So it's a lock dependency between rfkill->mutex and wl->mutex?
> > So, now comes the question that really matters. Who is the caller
> > of rfkill_toggle_radio, in the case where it crashes?
> >
>
> Here is the full dump. It looks to me as if b43_rfkill_soft_toggle() calls rfkill_handler(), which
> calls rfkill_toggle_radio() and it is calling b43_rfkill_soft_toggle(). I'd call that a loop.
I think it's a different bug. The backtrace seems corrupted.
Can you try this patch? There is some circular locking in rfkill.
Index: wireless-2.6/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
===================================================================
--- wireless-2.6.orig/net/rfkill/rfkill.c 2007-11-20 19:09:35.000000000 +0100
+++ wireless-2.6/net/rfkill/rfkill.c 2007-11-28 17:09:55.000000000 +0100
@@ -60,11 +60,7 @@ static void rfkill_led_trigger(struct rf
static int rfkill_toggle_radio(struct rfkill *rfkill,
enum rfkill_state state)
{
- int retval;
-
- retval = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rfkill->mutex);
- if (retval)
- return retval;
+ int retval = 0;
if (state != rfkill->state) {
retval = rfkill->toggle_radio(rfkill->data, state);
@@ -74,7 +70,6 @@ static int rfkill_toggle_radio(struct rf
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex);
return retval;
}
@@ -158,12 +153,13 @@ static ssize_t rfkill_state_store(struct
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
+ if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&rfkill->mutex))
+ return -ERESTARTSYS;
error = rfkill_toggle_radio(rfkill,
state ? RFKILL_STATE_ON : RFKILL_STATE_OFF);
- if (error)
- return error;
+ mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex);
- return count;
+ return error ? error : count;
}
static ssize_t rfkill_claim_show(struct device *dev,
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-28 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-27 16:03 [RFC/T] b43: Fix Radio On/Off LED action Larry Finger
2007-11-27 16:13 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 16:28 ` Larry Finger
2007-11-27 17:05 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 18:29 ` Ehud Gavron
2007-11-27 20:02 ` [RFC/T V2] " Larry Finger
2007-11-27 20:20 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-27 21:22 ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 14:11 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-28 15:05 ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 16:13 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-11-28 16:41 ` Larry Finger
2007-11-28 16:46 ` Michael Buesch
2007-11-28 17:08 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711281713.02919.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).