From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:8773 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755414AbXK3Ia4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:30:56 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so2169655nfb for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:30:54 -0800 (PST) To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: Please pull 'upstream' branch of rt2x00 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:51:02 +0100 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200711272146.53518.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200711272154.29350.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20071129222641.GE32730@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20071129222641.GE32730@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200711301051.02596.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20071130_083103_045250_E4F8C47B) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 29 November 2007, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:54:29PM +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > > > Please merge the patches for 2.6.24 > > > Sorry that should be: > > 08 - Only update rssi average approximation on receiving beacon frames. > > 09 - Remove redundant code in rfkill setup > > 10 - Cleanup rfkill > > Actually it looks to me like 9 and 10 apply to code that isn't in > 2.6.24. 8 looks like it is close, but it doesn't quite apply either. > I'll try to massage it in -- hopefully Jeff won't mind the extra > trouble when rebasing... 9 and 10 should apply cleanly since the rfkill code hasn't changed for quite some time now. In fact I believe it hasn't changed since the initial merge to 2.6.24-rc. Anyway, I'll try to create a patch for the upstream-jgarzik branch this weekend, that would safe you and jeff some work. :) Ivo