From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from s131.mittwaldmedien.de ([62.216.178.31]:29938 "EHLO
	s131.mittwaldmedien.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750790AbXLGOrL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:47:11 -0500
From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: implement new scanning logic
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:47:37 +0100
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
References: <200711290927.15915.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <1196787130.4772.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1196787130.4772.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-Id: <200712071547.37944.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20071207_144715_443738_5E5BA0E3)
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

> So I tested this one, not the one from libertas-dev (which was
> posted a day earlier).  And this one seems fine.  Ack for
> commit to libertas-2.6.
>
> Would you like me to confirm on SDIO?

I now commit that to libertas-2.6, even without your 
SDIO-testing.