linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	sam <sam@ravnborg.org>, Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: better rate control algorithm selection
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:00:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071221210017.36f34fe3@morte> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1198253375.16241.76.camel@johannes.berg>

On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:09:35 +0100
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:

> Below is the patch, comments welcome. I think this is the way we want
> it, tristate for all rate control algorithms regardless of whether
> mac80211 is modular (where =y then means "build algorithm into
> mac80211") and forcing one of the algorithms to y to do exactly that.

What about avoiding to force any algorithm to y, and instead always build a
dummy (a few lines of code which would just set the rate to the lowest
available) rate control algorithm into mac80211?

Looks good otherwise.


--
Ciao
Stefano

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-21 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-21 16:09 [PATCH] mac80211: better rate control algorithm selection Johannes Berg
2007-12-21 20:00 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2007-12-21 20:43   ` Johannes Berg
2007-12-21 20:57     ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-21 21:15       ` Johannes Berg
2007-12-21 21:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Johannes Berg
2007-12-21 22:26   ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-30 23:11 ` [PATCH] " Sam Ravnborg
2007-12-31  7:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-02  8:41     ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-02  8:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-02  8:52         ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-02 15:23           ` Michael Buesch
2008-01-02 15:27             ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-02 15:29               ` Michael Buesch
2008-01-02 23:05               ` Stefano Brivio
2008-01-02 14:04   ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071221210017.36f34fe3@morte \
    --to=stefano.brivio@polimi.it \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).