From: bruno randolf <bruno@thinktube.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
"Ivo van Doorn" <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:50:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802051050.22187.bruno@thinktube.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890802021522g5bffe97cg31ba57f6f1f200b9@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday 03 February 2008 08:22:12 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Sure ACK. Also as was stated, even with IBSS merge functionality
> working you could up with nodes splitting up due to missing the
> "leader" beacon due to interference or even strange radio node
> problems. A solution to this we implemented at Orbit with MadWifi was
> that instead of generating "random" BSSIDs you'd create one based on
> the hash of the SSID [1]. This ensures that nodes with identical SSIDs
> end up with identical BSSIDs, regardless of any strange problems.
> Technically from what I have gathered this doesn't break the specs but
> would prevent this split-IBSS problem. I actually like to see this
> technique added into mac80211 too.
>
> [1] http://www.orbit-lab.org/wiki/HowTo/bssidFix
this looks like a good idea to avoid many ibss merge problems, and it could be
really useful to have that (maybe as an option?) in mac80211. but unless we
have ibss merge functionality you won't be able to join older networks
(higher TSF) which don't use that scheme, so we still need that to be able to
communicate with other ("standard") drivers.
i guess the general question for mac80211 is: do we want and allow more
liberal interpretations of the standard concerning IBSS mode or do we
strictly stick with the "book"?
in my opinion these "extensions" are necessary in order to make IBSS mode
useful at all and therefore we need them! and as long as they are able to
interoperate with other drivers in IBSS mode i don't see a problem.
what's the position of the mac80211 maintainers concerning this? is there any
chance of getting these patches merged?
bruno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-05 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-18 12:52 [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging Bruno Randolf
2008-01-20 10:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-20 10:43 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-21 1:52 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 16:05 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 19:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 19:54 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 20:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 20:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-23 1:59 ` [ath5k-devel] " bruno randolf
2008-01-22 23:16 ` Adam Baker
2008-01-22 23:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-23 14:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 5:51 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 1:57 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-23 14:48 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-23 17:22 ` Dan Williams
2008-01-24 3:49 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 3:26 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 16:55 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 8:01 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-02 23:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-05 1:50 ` bruno randolf [this message]
2008-02-05 1:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 10:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 4:34 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-06 18:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 20:10 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 3:58 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 2:00 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-15 1:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-15 1:40 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-07 3:52 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-24 5:43 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 8:51 ` Kalle Valo
2008-01-24 14:27 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 14:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 6:16 ` bruno randolf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-05 11:08 [PATCH 2/2] " Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 2:49 ` [PATCH] " Bruno Randolf
2008-02-06 23:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-08 9:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 3:25 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-12 9:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 6:19 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-14 14:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-12 9:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 10:19 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-08 9:41 Joerg Pommnitz
2008-02-15 15:09 [PATCH 3/3] " Johannes Berg
2008-02-16 2:29 ` [PATCH] " Bruno Randolf
2008-02-17 9:11 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 1:42 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:15 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 2:03 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:16 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802051050.22187.bruno@thinktube.com \
--to=bruno@thinktube.com \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).