From: bruno randolf <bruno@thinktube.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, mcgrof@gmail.com,
jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
flamingice@sourmilk.net, jbenc@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:25:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802121225.02045.bruno@thinktube.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202341955.9965.26.camel@johannes.berg>
On Thursday 07 February 2008 08:52:35 Johannes Berg wrote:
> Looks fine, one last question:
> > + if (mactime <=3D timestamp) {
> > + if (CONFIG_MAC80211_IBSS_DEBUG || net_ratelimit())
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: beacon TSF higher than "
> > + "local TSF - IBSS merge with BSSID %s\n",
> > + dev->name, print_mac(mac, mgmt->bssid));
>
> I'd rewrite that as timestamp >=3D mactime and rename the two variabl=
es
> (maybe beacon_timestamp and phy_timestamp or so?), but that's not too
> important.
i'll do that, sure.
> However, in any case "<=3D" seems wrong, shouldn't we only=20
> merge when it's actually higher? If your hardware/firmware has synced
> properly and the PHY delay is accounted for properly etc. then every
> beacon from the own BSS will fulfil the =3D=3D part of the condition,=
no?
true. i was not aware that the beacon timestamp is taking PHY delays in=
to=20
account and wrongly asumed that the RX timestamp should always be a bit=
=20
later.
(which is also what i saw on my atheros hardware: we usually get the RX=
=20
timestamp about 60 to 300 usec later than the beacon timestamp, but it'=
s=20
quite likely that we have not calibrated everything 100% correctly.)
> Also, the beacon timestamp is defined as follows:
>
> A STA sending a beacon shall set the value of the beacon=E2=80=
=99s
> timestamp so that it equals the value of the STA=E2=80=99s TS=
=46 timer at
> the time that the data symbol containing the first bit of the
> timestamp is transmitted to the PHY plus the transmitting STA=
=E2=80=99s
> delays through its local PHY from the MAC-PHY interface to it=
s
> interface with the WM [e.g., antenna, light-emitting diode (L=
ED)
> emission surface].
>
> (IEEE 802.11 11.1.2)
>
> Since we define the RX timestamp to be when the first data symbol of =
the
> frame hits the PHY, we here have to take into account the offset betw=
een
> the two, at 1 MBit that's 192 (=3D24 bytes * 8 usecs/byte) usecs earl=
ier
> than the beacon timestamp.
>
> On the other hand, you're unlikely to hit that window, but I suppose =
it
> warrants at least a comment.
thats a very good point! if everything was calibrated properly and all =
delays=20
taken into account *exactly* that would cause us to go thru a merge all=
the=20
time, on every received beacon. i think we have to take that into accou=
nt,=20
for different bitrates. what about something like:
timestamp >=3D ( mactime + (24 * 8 / beacon_phy_rate_in_mbps ))
i'll resend my patch adding that and the other proposed changes soon.
bruno
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-12 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-05 10:49 [PATCH 0/2] ibss merge resend Bruno Randolf
2008-02-05 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: move function ieee80211_sta_join_ibss() Bruno Randolf
2008-02-05 10:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: enable IBSS merging Bruno Randolf
2008-02-05 11:08 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 2:46 ` [PATCH] addressing johannes latest comments and adding a channel check Bruno Randolf
2008-02-06 2:59 ` [ath5k-devel] " bruno randolf
2008-02-06 2:49 ` [PATCH] mac80211: enable IBSS merging Bruno Randolf
2008-02-06 23:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-08 9:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 3:25 ` bruno randolf [this message]
2008-02-12 9:50 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 6:19 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-14 14:12 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-12 9:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-14 10:19 ` bruno randolf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-15 15:09 [PATCH 3/3] " Johannes Berg
2008-02-16 2:29 ` [PATCH] " Bruno Randolf
2008-02-17 9:11 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 1:42 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:15 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-18 2:03 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-18 11:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-08 9:41 Joerg Pommnitz
2008-01-18 12:52 Bruno Randolf
2008-01-20 10:17 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-20 10:43 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-21 1:52 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 16:05 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 19:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 19:54 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 20:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-22 20:51 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-22 23:16 ` Adam Baker
2008-01-22 23:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-01-23 14:49 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 5:51 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-21 1:57 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-23 14:48 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-23 17:22 ` Dan Williams
2008-01-24 3:49 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 3:26 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 16:55 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 8:01 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-02 23:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-05 1:50 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-05 1:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 10:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-06 4:34 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-06 18:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-06 20:10 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-07 3:58 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-12 2:00 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-15 1:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-02-15 1:40 ` bruno randolf
2008-02-07 3:52 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-02-08 9:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-01-24 5:43 ` bruno randolf
2008-01-24 8:51 ` Kalle Valo
2008-01-24 14:27 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-24 14:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-25 6:16 ` bruno randolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802121225.02045.bruno@thinktube.com \
--to=bruno@thinktube.com \
--cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
--cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).