From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10068] New: timer.c crash using WI-FI (current process: firefox)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:28:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080225162824.0af4a57d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-10068-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:16:40 -0800 (PST) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10068
>
> Summary: timer.c crash using WI-FI (current process: firefox)
> Product: Timers
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.24.2
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: blocking
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: johnstul@us.ibm.com
> ReportedBy: zacmarco@yahoo.it
>
>
> Latest working kernel version: 2.6.19.2
> Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.24.2
> Distribution: Debian Lenny/Sid
> Hardware Environment: athlon XP 2400+ using a zd1211 device (driver zd1211rw)
> Software Environment: X11 with Gnome; crashed while using firefox (iceweasel)
>
> Problem Description:
> System crashes completely. It seems related to wireless network usage, I've
> used my system several times without connecting the wifi device (and without
> any other network interface enabled).
> I haven't found the problem on 2.6.19.2 kernel I think because zd1211rw driver
> didn't work for my card
> Here's the log (not flushed to disk!!!)
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c: 607!
> Invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> Modules linked in: cpufreq_stats nls_cp437 sbp2 scsi_mod loop zd1211rw
> ieee80211softmac parport_pc parport ohci1394 snd_intel8x0 ieee1394 sis900
> ehci_hcd ide_cd cdrom fan asus_acpi backlight battery ac
>
> Pid 3239, comm: firefox-bin Not tainted (2.6.24.2 #1)
> EIP:0060 :[<c011e54b>] EFLAGS:00210007 CPU:0
> EIP is at cascade+0x3b/0x57
> EAX:0 EBX:0 ECX:5 EDX:d9eb3ca4
> ESI:5 EDI:c0485640 EBP:d9ecdf30 ESP:d9ecdf30
> DS:007b ES:007b FS:0000 GS:0033 SS:0068
>
> ...
>
> Call trace
>
> [<c011e6ad>] run_timer_softirq+0x55/0x141
> [<c012b8e3>] tick_handle_periodic+0xf/0x54
> [<c011bdcc>] __do_softirq+0x35/0x75
> [<c011be2e>] do_softirq+022/0x26
> [<c01055b0>] do_IRQ+0x58/0x6b
> [<c033b1a7>] schedule+0x1f0/0x20a
> [<c01045e7>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
>
> Kernel Panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
urgh.
Yes, it's probably a wireless driver bug. But look at the BUG_ON():
static int cascade(tvec_base_t *base, tvec_t *tv, int index)
{
/* cascade all the timers from tv up one level */
struct timer_list *timer, *tmp;
struct list_head tv_list;
list_replace_init(tv->vec + index, &tv_list);
/*
* We are removing _all_ timers from the list, so we
* don't have to detach them individually.
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(timer, tmp, &tv_list, entry) {
BUG_ON(tbase_get_base(timer->base) != base);
internal_add_timer(base, timer);
}
return index;
}
if we're going to detect some bug, we shold provide _some_ information
telling the poor programmer what he did wrong! This one is very obscure.
Seems we found a timer on CPU A's list, but the timer thinks it's on timer
B's list. Or not on a list at all.
Question is: what sequence of timer interace calls could have caused this
to occur? And can we add a check for that bug at the time where it occurs,
rather later on in the timer interrupt handler?
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-26 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-10068-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-02-26 0:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-02-26 1:03 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10068] New: timer.c crash using WI-FI (current process: firefox) Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-26 1:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080225162824.0af4a57d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).