From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the bcm43xx driver breakage in 2.6.24/25.
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:54:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080229205400.GG27212@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802291105.35713.mb@bu3sch.de>
* Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> wrote:
> On Friday 29 February 2008 09:21:19 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:17:55 +0300 Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Theese two patches fix a problem instroduced in Linux 2.6.24, and
> > > still present in the current Linus' 2.6.25 tree.
> > >
> > > The bcm43xx Wifi driver won't work any more, if the b44 Ethernet
> > > driver is enabled. This happens because the b44 driver
> > > needlessly enables the b43_pci_bridge code, which claims
> > > the same pci ids as the bcm43xx driver. The b43_pci_bridge
> > > code is needed for the b43{legacy} drivers, but for the
> > > b44, only the "ssb pci core" is needed.
> >
> > Hate to stick my head into this beehive, but...
> >
> > I have a patch queued (the-scheduled-bcm43xx-removal.patch) which
> > will remove this driver from 2.6.26.
> >
> > Is that bad?
>
> Not at all. The b43 driver from 2.6.26 will work. So there's no reason
> to keep bcm43xx. Alexey just tested a patch that backports the fix to
> 2.6.24 and it works fine.
yeah, i'd support the removal of it too, if the transition is smooth and
the regressions are resolved. And it should be smooth, as long as users
are able to load the firmware blob, right? There's also an entry for it
in Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt:
What: bcm43xx wireless network driver
When: 2.6.26
Files: drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx
Why: This driver's functionality has been replaced by the
mac80211-based b43 and b43legacy drivers.
Who: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <47C01D03.9030601@gmail.com>
2008-02-29 8:21 ` [PATCH] Fix the bcm43xx driver breakage in 2.6.24/25 Andrew Morton
2008-02-29 10:05 ` Michael Buesch
2008-02-29 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-02-29 22:49 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080229205400.GG27212@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=stefano.brivio@polimi.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).