linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bruno randolf <bruno@thinktube.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
	Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, jirislaby@gmail.com,
	mickflemm@gmail.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linville@tuxdriver.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	flamingice@sourmilk.net, jbenc@suse.cz,
	"Ivan Seskar" <Seskar@winlab.rutgers.edu>,
	"Jean Tourrilhes" <jt@hpl.hp.com>,
	"Haris Kremo" <harisk@winlab.rutgers.edu>,
	"Ivo van Doorn" <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: use hardware flags for signal/noise units
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:05:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804031105.06176.bruno@thinktube.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890804021227y520380f7j8ad25eb30f635d2b@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday 03 April 2008 04:27:31 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >  so in the "unspecified" case we really don't know much about the units,
> > in the worst case we can't even assume that 1/2 the value will mean 1/2
> > of the received signal strength. it's very hard to work with this values,
> > but it's better than nothing.
> >
> >  other cards might not have noise, so no absolute (dBm) measurement, but
> > a form of RSSI which is measured in dB (that is a logarithmic
> > difference). in this case we might not know which reference point the
> > measurement is taken to, but we know how it behaves: -3 dB means half of
> > the signal strength. if you add a 6dB gain antenna you can expect to see
> > the signal reading to increase by 6dB. it's not strictly SNR (because we
> > don't know the noise) but quite close to it.
> >
> >  i think it's important to know the difference between this 3 cases i
> > order to make some sense of the values in userspace gui, roaming agents,
> > mesh link metrics, etc...
>
> Agreed, but can you give me an example of a card which does provide
> RSSI in db for values we don't know and that UNSPEC cannot handle? Is
> this what is assumed of the rt2x00 cards?

i currently assume that for rt2x00 and zd1211 cards - but i'm really just 
guessing here. feedback from driver authors or people who have more knowledge 
about the hardware would be greatly appreciated!

here's the current table:

    DRIVER          SIGNAL    MAX       NOISE   QUAL
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    adm8211         unspec(?) 100   n/a     missing
    at76_usb        unspec(?) (?)   unused  missing
    ath5k           dBm             dBm     percent rssi
    b43legacy       dBm             dBm     percent jssi(?)
    b43             dBm             dBm     percent jssi(?)
    iwl-3945        dBm             dBm     percent snr+more
    iwl-4965        dBm             dBm     percent snr+more
    p54             unspec    127   n/a     missing
    rt2x00                              percent rssi+tx/rx frame success
      rt2400        dB(?)     100   n/a
      rt2500pci     dB(?)     100   n/a
      rt2500usb     dB(?)     100   n/a
      rt61pci       dB(?)     100   n/a
      rt73usb       dB(?)     100   n/a
    rtl8180         unspec(?) 65    n/a     (?)
    rtl8187         unspec(?) 65    (?)     noise(?)
    zd1211          dB(?)     100   n/a     percent

bruno

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-03  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-26 12:30 [PATCH] mac80211: use hardware flags for signal/noise units Bruno Randolf
2008-03-26 22:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-03-27  0:19   ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-03-27  2:47     ` bruno randolf
2008-03-27 16:52       ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-03-31  6:32         ` bruno randolf
2008-03-31 17:47           ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-04-02  3:06             ` bruno randolf
2008-04-02 23:19     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-04-02 23:56       ` Jean Tourrilhes
2008-04-03  1:55       ` bruno randolf
2008-03-27  2:07   ` bruno randolf
2008-04-02 19:27     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-04-03  2:05       ` bruno randolf [this message]
2008-03-27 12:47 ` Johannes Berg
2008-03-28 10:52   ` bruno randolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804031105.06176.bruno@thinktube.com \
    --to=bruno@thinktube.com \
    --cc=Seskar@winlab.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org \
    --cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=harisk@winlab.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=kune@deine-taler.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
    --cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).