From: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
To: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] WiMAX stack and drivers for Intel WiMAX Link 5050
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:49:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804092249.26231.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804091112.05392.inaky@linux.intel.com>
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 20:12:05 Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Holger Schurig wrote:
> > > > 9. Anyway to reuse existing usbnet infrastructure?
> > >
> > > Nope, the 2400 is a pure IP device (as Marcel mentioned).
> >
> > With "pure IP", do you mean IPv4? Or do you mean "pure
> > IPv4/IPv6"? If it is "pure IPv4", then WiMAX seems not future
> > proof ...
>
> It takes both. I guess what we should be saying is that it is
> not an ethernet-frame based device :) What you give the device
> is sent over to the base station, so it really is whatever the
> base station operator implements, which is mostly IP protocol
> (4, 6 or whatever).
It's a pity that "Internet Protocol" (as in IPv4/IPv6) as well
as "Intellectual Property" (as in IP-Core) have the same abbreviation.
;-)
Regards,
Chr.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 18:07 [ANN] WiMAX stack and drivers for Intel WiMAX Link 5050 Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-04-01 18:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-04-01 18:33 ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-04-08 15:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-04-08 18:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-04-08 19:44 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-04-08 20:59 ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-04-09 6:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-09 8:05 ` Holger Schurig
2008-04-09 8:23 ` Philip Craig
2008-04-09 18:09 ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-04-09 20:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-09 7:59 ` Holger Schurig
2008-04-09 18:12 ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2008-04-09 20:49 ` Chr [this message]
2008-04-08 19:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-08 18:57 jayant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804092249.26231.chunkeey@web.de \
--to=chunkeey@web.de \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=inaky@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).