From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:30248 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756553AbYDJSLu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:11:50 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so1365356ugc.16 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:11:27 -0700 (PDT) To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: mac80211 ifup & ifdown Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:11:56 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200804100017.23359.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1207839011.19080.11.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1207839011.19080.11.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200804102011.57014.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20080410_191154_922286_558501D2) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 10 April 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > I think I recently saw some discussion about mac80211 having a bug > > when the interface was brought down and back up again which would > > leave mac80211 & driver in a state from which it could no longer be > > able to associate again. > > > > I can't find the particular email again, but was this issue indeed a bug > > with mac80211? And if so, is that bug present in 2.6.25 or only in > > wireless-testing? > > The only thing I can remember is that it didn't used to automatically > re-associate which should be in now. Ah ok. Thanks for the clarification. Hopefully that solves one of the rt2x00 bugs. :) Ivo