linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Morrison <bdm@fenrir.org.uk>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:  RE: iwl3945 problem with 2.6.25-rc9
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:23:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080418232358.000fbdf7@peterson.fenrir.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D936D925018D154694D8A362EEB089200438B728@orsmsx416.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:12:13 -0700
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com> wrote:

> Explicitly enabling sw scanning is an interesting idea. 
> 
> Marcus: could you please run your test twice with that patch? The first
> time you run it as you did before, the second time please provide the
> driver parameter "disable_hw_scan=1" together with the debug parameter.

Not wishing to muddy the waters, but I've found that the iwlwifi driver
with a 3945 card is only reliable for scanning and associating for
my laptop (x86_64) with disable_hw_scan=1 set, this is with
2.4.24.4-64.fc8 kernel. Driver version is 1.2.26.

Previous to the recent heavy driver development, with 2.6.23.15-137.fc8
the opposite was the case. This was driver version 1.2.23.

Currently with sw scanning *every* scan returns my own 2 APs, whereas
using hw scanning I often receive "No scan results" and my 2 APs
sometimes appear in the scan output and disappear frequently. It's
equally unreliable when I can see my neighbours APs, the software scan
is reliable when signals are strong enough to register at all.

One of the Fedora common bugs advised the used of sw scanning, this is
still showing up on the common bugs list.

-- 

Brian Morrison

   "Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
    after a while you realize you are muddy and the pig is enjoying it."

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-18 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-15 22:24 iwl3945 problem with 2.6.25-rc9 Marcus Furlong
2008-04-16 18:28 ` Chatre, Reinette
2008-04-16 19:01   ` Marcus Furlong
2008-04-16 19:26     ` Dan Williams
2008-04-16 19:48     ` Marcus Furlong
2008-04-16 20:04       ` Dan Williams
2008-04-16 21:22         ` Chatre, Reinette
2008-04-16 22:05           ` Marcus Furlong
2008-04-16 22:55             ` Chatre, Reinette
2008-04-17  0:06               ` Marcus Furlong
2008-04-18  3:03               ` Marcus Furlong
2008-04-18 21:46                 ` Chatre, Reinette
2008-04-18 21:57                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-18 22:12                     ` Chatre, Reinette
2008-04-18 22:23                       ` Brian Morrison [this message]
2008-04-18 22:35                         ` Chatre, Reinette
2008-04-18 22:38                           ` Brian Morrison
2008-04-18 22:37                         ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-18 22:39                           ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-19  0:28                             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-04-19  8:32                               ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-19 12:39                                 ` Vincent C Jones
2008-04-19 13:09                                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-19 13:44                                     ` Vincent C Jones
2008-04-19 13:48                                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-19 13:51                                         ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-20 15:33                                           ` Dan Williams
2008-04-20 15:24                                     ` Dan Williams
2008-04-20 20:39                                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-04-21  0:14                                   ` Dan Williams
2008-04-21 18:39                                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-04-21 19:20                                       ` Dan Williams
2008-04-21 20:47                                         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-04-20 15:28                         ` Dan Williams
2008-04-19  2:32                       ` Marcus Furlong
2008-04-22 23:02                         ` Chatre, Reinette
2008-04-23 13:23                           ` Marcus Furlong
2008-04-16 23:01           ` Marcus Furlong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080418232358.000fbdf7@peterson.fenrir.org.uk \
    --to=bdm@fenrir.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).