From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:3498 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755129AbYDUSCg (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:02:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:41:22 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Kyle McMartin Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, dcbw@redhat.com Subject: Re: iwl4965: slow scans Message-ID: <20080421174122.GA10857@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080421_200326_781511_4C3526F4) References: <20080421160318.GA19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080421160318.GA19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:03:18PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > I've noticed recently in rawhide that scanning for networks when I come > back from suspend takes an age. It seems to be upwards of 3~4 minutes > before I'm able to reassociate with my ap. > > I'm pulling a pile of rpms to figure out when the change to > linux-2.6-wireless*.patch might have caused this (it doesn't *seem* to > happen on upstream, but since the patch might make it to upstream soon, > I figured I should keep linux-wireless@ in the loop.) > > Willing to bash on whatever I need to to improve this. Sounds like the issue here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441819 Perhaps you could post some iwevent info as Dan requested there as well? John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com