From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH stable] b43: Fix some TX/RX locking issues
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 12:19:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805021219.58153.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
This fixes some TX/RX related locking issues.
With this patch applied, some of the PHY transmission errors are fixed.
This patch is in wireless-testing.git, commit
c83d30b31aebdf652f78f4f6898959e44fd67ca3
Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Index: linux-2.6.25/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h 2008-05-01 12:29:34.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h 2008-05-01 12:29:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -625,12 +625,16 @@ struct b43_wl {
struct b43_wldev *current_dev;
/* Pointer to the ieee80211 hardware data structure */
struct ieee80211_hw *hw;
struct mutex mutex;
spinlock_t irq_lock;
+ /* R/W lock for data transmission.
+ * Transmissions on 2+ queues can run concurrently, but somebody else
+ * might sync with TX by write_lock_irqsave()'ing. */
+ rwlock_t tx_lock;
/* Lock for LEDs access. */
spinlock_t leds_lock;
/* Lock for SHM access. */
spinlock_t shm_lock;
/* We can only have one operating interface (802.11 core)
Index: linux-2.6.25/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c 2008-05-01 12:29:47.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c 2008-05-01 12:29:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -619,12 +619,13 @@ static void b43_synchronize_irq(struct b
/* DummyTransmission function, as documented on
* http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/DummyTransmission
*/
void b43_dummy_transmission(struct b43_wldev *dev)
{
+ struct b43_wl *wl = dev->wl;
struct b43_phy *phy = &dev->phy;
unsigned int i, max_loop;
u16 value;
u32 buffer[5] = {
0x00000000,
0x00D40000,
@@ -645,12 +646,15 @@ void b43_dummy_transmission(struct b43_w
break;
default:
B43_WARN_ON(1);
return;
}
+ spin_lock_irq(&wl->irq_lock);
+ write_lock(&wl->tx_lock);
+
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++)
b43_ram_write(dev, i * 4, buffer[i]);
/* Commit writes */
b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_MACCTL);
@@ -685,12 +689,15 @@ void b43_dummy_transmission(struct b43_w
if (!(value & 0x0100))
break;
udelay(10);
}
if (phy->radio_ver == 0x2050 && phy->radio_rev <= 0x5)
b43_radio_write16(dev, 0x0051, 0x0037);
+
+ write_unlock(&wl->tx_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&wl->irq_lock);
}
static void key_write(struct b43_wldev *dev,
u8 index, u8 algorithm, const u8 * key)
{
unsigned int i;
@@ -2589,21 +2596,27 @@ static int b43_rng_init(struct b43_wl *w
static int b43_op_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct sk_buff *skb,
struct ieee80211_tx_control *ctl)
{
struct b43_wl *wl = hw_to_b43_wl(hw);
struct b43_wldev *dev = wl->current_dev;
- int err = -ENODEV;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int err;
if (unlikely(!dev))
- goto out;
- if (unlikely(b43_status(dev) < B43_STAT_STARTED))
- goto out;
- /* DMA-TX is done without a global lock. */
- err = b43_dma_tx(dev, skb, ctl);
-out:
+ return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
+
+ /* Transmissions on seperate queues can run concurrently. */
+ read_lock_irqsave(&wl->tx_lock, flags);
+
+ err = -ENODEV;
+ if (likely(b43_status(dev) >= B43_STAT_STARTED))
+ err = b43_dma_tx(dev, skb, ctl);
+
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->tx_lock, flags);
+
if (unlikely(err))
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
static int b43_op_conf_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
@@ -3106,22 +3119,22 @@ static void b43_wireless_core_stop(struc
spin_lock_irqsave(&wl->irq_lock, flags);
dev->irq_savedstate = b43_interrupt_disable(dev, B43_IRQ_ALL);
b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_GEN_IRQ_MASK); /* flush */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->irq_lock, flags);
b43_synchronize_irq(dev);
+ write_lock_irqsave(&wl->tx_lock, flags);
b43_set_status(dev, B43_STAT_INITIALIZED);
+ write_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->tx_lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
/* Must unlock as it would otherwise deadlock. No races here.
* Cancel the possibly running self-rearming periodic work. */
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->periodic_work);
mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
- ieee80211_stop_queues(wl->hw); //FIXME this could cause a deadlock, as mac80211 seems buggy.
-
b43_mac_suspend(dev);
free_irq(dev->dev->irq, dev);
b43dbg(wl, "Wireless interface stopped\n");
}
/* Locking: wl->mutex */
@@ -4081,12 +4094,13 @@ static int b43_wireless_init(struct ssb_
/* Get and initialize struct b43_wl */
wl = hw_to_b43_wl(hw);
memset(wl, 0, sizeof(*wl));
wl->hw = hw;
spin_lock_init(&wl->irq_lock);
+ rwlock_init(&wl->tx_lock);
spin_lock_init(&wl->leds_lock);
spin_lock_init(&wl->shm_lock);
mutex_init(&wl->mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wl->devlist);
ssb_set_devtypedata(dev, wl);
reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805021219.58153.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).