From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: rt61pci/rt73usb: Hardware decryption IV/EIV
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 21:41:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805022141.28351.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am working on the Hardware encryption/decryption in rt61pci/rt73usb,
and I am currently hitting a wall on the IV/EIV part.
To make mac80211 I am inserting the IV/EIV data right after the ieee80211 header,
but as soon as I do that, all data frames magically disappear in mac80211.
Without the IV/EIV data the frames are getting through correctly (i.e. I can ping my AP)
And yes, I am setting the RX_FLAG_IV_STRIPPED flag when the IV is gone, and clear
it when the IV is present. :)
This is what is currently happening in the driver part:
1) If decryptor indicates a cipher was used during RX, assume decryption took place
2) read IV/EIV data from decriptor
3) set RX_FLAG_IV_STRIPPED
4) check decryption status and set RX_FLAG_DECRYPTED if decryption succeeded
After that the following happens in rt2x00pci:
iv_len = ((!!rxdesc.iv) * 4) + ((!!rxdesc.eiv) * 4);
if (1 && (rxdesc.flags & RX_FLAG_IV_STRIPPED) && iv_len) {
skb_put(entry->skb, rxdesc.size + iv_len);
/* Copy ieee80211 header */
memcpy(entry->skb->data, priv_rx->data, header_size);
/* Copy IV/EIV data */
if (iv_len >= 4)
memcpy(entry->skb->data + header_size,
&rxdesc.iv, 4);
if (iv_len >= 8)
memcpy(entry->skb->data + header_size + 4,
&rxdesc.eiv, 4);
/* Copy payload */
memcpy(entry->skb->data + header_size + iv_len,
priv_rx->data + header_size,
rxdesc.size - header_size);
/* Update frame length to include IV/EIV */
rxdesc.size += iv_len;
rxdesc.flags &= ~RX_FLAG_IV_STRIPPED;
}
But when this code runs, the frame will somewhere disappear in mac80211.
I noticed that when I didn't insert the IV into the frame the debugfs counter
rx_handlers_drop remains relatively low (max 5 after a minute or so).
But when the IV is inserted this counter starts counting up with a speed
that might patch the number of pings I am sending out. (note that ping never
returns any results, not even a timeout).
After adding tons of debuglines in the RX path in mac80211 I find the following:
ieee80211_data_to_8023(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
{
<snip>
case IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS:
/* DA BSSID SA */
memcpy(dst, hdr->addr1, ETH_ALEN);
memcpy(src, hdr->addr3, ETH_ALEN);
if (sdata->vif.type != IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_STA ||
(is_multicast_ether_addr(dst) &&
!compare_ether_addr(src, dev->dev_addr)))
return -1;
break;
<snip>
}
The increase of the rx_handlers_drop counter is caused by this if statement,
printing out the frames for which the IV was inserted, and which frames were
dropped here, I get the following:
PRE: 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c 00:16:b6:12:5e:5c
PRE: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c
wlan3: dropped FromDS frame (DST=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff SRC=00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c)
PRE: 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c 00:16:b6:12:5e:5c
PRE: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c
wlan3: dropped FromDS frame (DST=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff SRC=00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c)
PRE: 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c 00:16:b6:12:5e:5c
PRE: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c
wlan3: dropped FromDS frame (DST=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff SRC=00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c)
PRE: 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c 00:16:b6:12:5e:5c
PRE: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c
wlan3: dropped FromDS frame (DST=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff SRC=00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c)
PRE: 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c 00:16:b6:12:5e:5c
PRE: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c
wlan3: dropped FromDS frame (DST=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff SRC=00:0c:f6:1e:43:4c)
All lines prefixed with "PRE" are printed in rt2x00 for each frame for which
the IV/EIV data was inserted, and the lines prefixed with "wlan3" are the
frames which were dropped in ieee80211_data_to_8023().
So now I am stuck, I see that the frames are dropped for a reason, and
obviously those are not the frames part of the ping. But I think it is very
strange these frames only show up when the IV/EIV data is being inserted.
Does anybody have any hint on where I should start looking about where
these frames come from, or what the cause might be of the disappearing frames?
Thanks,
Ivo
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-02 19:41 Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-05-02 20:11 ` rt61pci/rt73usb: Hardware decryption IV/EIV Johannes Berg
2008-05-02 20:38 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-05-02 20:42 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-02 20:59 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-05-02 21:02 ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-02 21:28 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-05-02 21:53 ` Ivo van Doorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805022141.28351.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).