From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60641 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754203AbYEHXVF (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 19:21:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 16:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080508.162059.42870104.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20080509_012005_713918_B1EB2935) To: tomasw@gmail.com Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, ron.rindjunsky@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: iwlwifi and tx info in skb->cb From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240805081616l3f49d770pefd517076a06b3ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <1ba2fa240805081528t45d7810cjfd553bf99daff096@mail.gmail.com> <1210285845.3547.81.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240805081616l3f49d770pefd517076a06b3ef@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Tomas Winkler" Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 02:16:14 +0300 > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Anyway, with the changes davem and I are making to actually save the > > *extra* copy we should be doing well. That's where you want to look for > > improvements. > > This is just for the bridging case, isn't it? No, all cases. We're repeating a lot of information for you, over and over again, it seems. Developers often find this frustrating, especially when they are trying to get their own work done.