From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2530 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752420AbYEPPvC (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2008 11:51:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:16:20 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Linux Netdev List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7][MAC8021]: Fix one more call to synchronize_rcu in atomic context. Message-ID: <20080516151620.GC6510@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080516_175108_292806_35C25882) References: <4821CE54.9000401@openvz.org> <482D6A80.6030804@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <482D6A80.6030804@openvz.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:05:36PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Sorry for bothering you, I guess that you're very busy now, > but what are you plans about this set? > > After I saw my first set included in some wireless git update, > I thought this one would be in some of the next ones (since > this set fixes some bugs in mesh tables), and started waiting. > > Here's a new wireless git update and this set is still not in. > Shall I resubmit one? Pavel, I still have your patchset. I'm still working on clearing my backlog, as well as waiting for some fixes to make the round-trip net-2.6->linux-2.6->net-next-2.6. The combination of that and the fact that your patch hit locking and "the usual suspects" had not yet commented on it made me decide to wait until the next round. If you are desperate to see them sooner, I could probably put them in the -testing tree early? Let me know if you would like that. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com