linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] b43: Fix noise calculation WARN_ON
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:36:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806121236.30255.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)

This removes a WARN_ON that is responsible for the following koops:
http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=b43_generate_noise_sample

The comment in the patch describes why it's safe to simply remove
the check.

Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>

---

John, this is a bugfix for 2.6.26


Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h
===================================================================
--- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h	2008-06-12 11:42:49.000000000 +0200
+++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h	2008-06-12 12:03:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -646,13 +646,12 @@ struct b43_pio {
 
 	struct b43_pio_rxqueue *rx_queue;
 };
 
 /* Context information for a noise calculation (Link Quality). */
 struct b43_noise_calculation {
-	u8 channel_at_start;
 	bool calculation_running;
 	u8 nr_samples;
 	s8 samples[8][4];
 };
 
 struct b43_stats {
Index: wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c
===================================================================
--- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c	2008-06-12 11:42:49.000000000 +0200
+++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c	2008-06-12 12:10:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -1142,22 +1142,20 @@ static void b43_jssi_write(struct b43_wl
 
 static void b43_generate_noise_sample(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 {
 	b43_jssi_write(dev, 0x7F7F7F7F);
 	b43_write32(dev, B43_MMIO_MACCMD,
 		    b43_read32(dev, B43_MMIO_MACCMD) | B43_MACCMD_BGNOISE);
-	B43_WARN_ON(dev->noisecalc.channel_at_start != dev->phy.channel);
 }
 
 static void b43_calculate_link_quality(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 {
 	/* Top half of Link Quality calculation. */
 
 	if (dev->noisecalc.calculation_running)
 		return;
-	dev->noisecalc.channel_at_start = dev->phy.channel;
 	dev->noisecalc.calculation_running = 1;
 	dev->noisecalc.nr_samples = 0;
 
 	b43_generate_noise_sample(dev);
 }
 
@@ -1168,15 +1166,22 @@ static void handle_irq_noise(struct b43_
 	u8 noise[4];
 	u8 i, j;
 	s32 average;
 
 	/* Bottom half of Link Quality calculation. */
 
+	/* Possible race condition: It might be possible that the user
+	 * changed to a different channel in the meantime since we
+	 * started the calculation. We ignore that fact, since it's
+	 * not really that much of a problem. The background noise is
+	 * an estimation only anyway. Slightly wrong results will get damped
+	 * by the averaging of the 8 sample rounds. Additionally the
+	 * value is shortlived. So it will be replaced by the next noise
+	 * calculation round soon. */
+
 	B43_WARN_ON(!dev->noisecalc.calculation_running);
-	if (dev->noisecalc.channel_at_start != phy->channel)
-		goto drop_calculation;
 	*((__le32 *)noise) = cpu_to_le32(b43_jssi_read(dev));
 	if (noise[0] == 0x7F || noise[1] == 0x7F ||
 	    noise[2] == 0x7F || noise[3] == 0x7F)
 		goto generate_new;
 
 	/* Get the noise samples. */
@@ -1211,17 +1216,16 @@ static void handle_irq_noise(struct b43_
 		if (tmp == 8)
 			average -= 72;
 		else
 			average -= 48;
 
 		dev->stats.link_noise = average;
-	      drop_calculation:
 		dev->noisecalc.calculation_running = 0;
 		return;
 	}
-      generate_new:
+generate_new:
 	b43_generate_noise_sample(dev);
 }
 
 static void handle_irq_tbtt_indication(struct b43_wldev *dev)
 {
 	if (b43_is_mode(dev->wl, IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_AP)) {

             reply	other threads:[~2008-06-12 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-12 10:36 Michael Buesch [this message]
2008-06-12 13:55 ` [PATCH] b43: Fix noise calculation WARN_ON Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200806121236.30255.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).