linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [BUG] iwlwifi 3945 works only with disable_hw_scan=1
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:03:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080613130310.GA5333@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213342523.7814.865.camel@debian.sh.intel.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:35:23PM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:59 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> > How does the hardware scan differ from what mac80211 does when
> > scanning?
> 
> Software scan disables Tx during the scan process while hardware scan
> doesn't. So you are expected to see continous ping responds instead of a
> freeze during the scan period. Hardware scan is also more efficient
> since it is handled by the firmware.
> 
> > I still see a lot of mysterious iwlwifi (especially iwl3945)
> > problems in Fedora that seem to disappear with disable_hw_scan=1.
> 
> I don't see this problem from my side. I'll do more testing for 3945.

FWIW, I don't have a reproducing environment that requires
disable_hw_scan either.  But I could probably dig-out several Fedora
bug reports that claim to need it.

> > Honestly I'm tempted to change it to "enable_hw_scan" instead...
> 
> Give the advantages, I'd like to use it if we can fix the bug (I haven't
> seen what the bug is myself). But you are free to change the default
> value until it is fixed. There is no such problem for 4965, right?

AFAICT only the 3945 seems to need it.

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-13 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-11 15:07 [BUG] iwlwifi 3945 works only with disable_hw_scan=1 Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12  3:28 ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-12 12:13   ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 13:59   ` [ipw3945-devel] " John W. Linville
2008-06-12 14:19     ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 20:25     ` Stephen Clark
2008-06-13  7:35     ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-13  8:48       ` Filippo Zangheri
2008-06-13 12:37         ` Tor Håkon Haugen
2008-06-13 13:03       ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-06-13 14:59         ` Tor Håkon Haugen
2008-06-13 15:06           ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-13 15:09             ` Tor Håkon Haugen
2008-06-13 20:04             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-14 10:00               ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-14 16:50               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-06-15 13:42               ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-15 13:47                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-15 14:12                   ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-15 15:09                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-15 16:47                       ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-16  5:50                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-16  5:52                           ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-16  6:08                             ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-16  6:46                               ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-16  7:11                                 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-16 14:35                               ` Dan Williams
2008-06-16 21:41                                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-18  8:28                             ` drago01
2008-06-24 19:47                               ` John W. Linville
2008-06-24 20:32                                 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-25  5:43                                 ` Tomas Winkler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-11 15:47 Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12  2:26 ` [ipw3945-devel] " Zhu Yi
2008-06-12  6:42   ` drago01
2008-06-12  7:08     ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-12 12:48   ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 14:22     ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 14:26       ` Norbert Preining
2008-06-12 15:02     ` Dan Williams
2008-06-13  2:00       ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-13 14:45         ` Dan Williams
2008-06-16  1:40           ` Zhu Yi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080613130310.GA5333@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).