Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Kolekar, Abhijeet" <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com>,
	drago01 <drago01@gmail.com>,
	Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@intel.com>,
	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl3945: use rfkill subsystem
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:35:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080626193540.GA28598@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213783675.1312.6.camel@johannes.berg>

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:07:54PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 19:34 -0700, Kolekar, Abhijeet wrote:
> > Added clearing the STATUS_EXIT_PENDING bit while ifup.
> > ACK.
> > 
> > The attached patch removes the sysfs interface from iwl3945 and uses
> > the rfkill subsystem instead.
> 
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
> > @@ -5913,7 +5913,9 @@ static void __iwl3945_down(struct iwl3945_priv
> > *priv)
> >  			       test_bit(STATUS_GEO_CONFIGURED,
> > &priv->status) <<
> >  					STATUS_GEO_CONFIGURED |
> >  			       test_bit(STATUS_IN_SUSPEND,
> 
> That patch is badly mangled by line-wrapping.

Can we have a non-damaged version of this patch?

Thanks,

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-26 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-16  7:59 [PATCH] iwl3945: use rfkill subsystem drago01
2008-06-18  2:34 ` Kolekar, Abhijeet
2008-06-18 10:07   ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-26 19:35     ` John W. Linville [this message]
2008-06-26 19:55       ` drago01

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080626193540.GA28598@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com \
    --cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=drago01@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox