From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:12421 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752113AbYGALLO (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:11:14 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so572113nfc.21 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:11:13 -0700 (PDT) To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: rt61 and TSF reporting? Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:15:09 +0200 Cc: linux-wireless References: <1214907990.7763.40.camel@johannes.berg> <200807011305.18802.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1214910405.29181.0.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1214910405.29181.0.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200807011315.09296.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20080701_131117_060737_561C9415) From: Ivo van Doorn Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > Note that these undocumented fields only are present in rt2500pci and rt61pci. > > > > > > Ok cool, I'll play with that, I should be able to make a patch myself, > > > thanks. > > > > Oh wait, just found a reference about those RXD words: > > > > * The following fields are for DMA block and HOST usage only. > > * Can't be touched by ASIC MAC block. > > > > In other words, they are for driver usage only. :S > > The only ones that are ever non-zero are 0, 1, 4 and 5. Guess not then. 4 contains data? 2 and 3 I understand since HW crypto is disabled in wireless-testing, but that should mean that 4 should also be 0 unless my estimation about it being the ICV field is wrong... What data is in there? Ivo