From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
krkumar2@in.ibm.com, mchan@broadcom.com, Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/39]: netdev: Move next_sched into struct netdev_queue.
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:49:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080714114913.GA4504@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080703.000333.199735542.davem@davemloft.net>
On 03-07-2008 09:03, David Miller wrote:
> We schedule queues, not the device, for output queue
> processing in BH.
>
...
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 8e38948..c5e3532 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1323,13 +1323,14 @@ static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> void __netif_schedule(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> if (!test_and_set_bit(__LINK_STATE_SCHED, &dev->state)) {
Isn't this bit supposed to be set/tested per queue as well, or do I
miss something?
Jarek P.
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = &dev->tx_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct softnet_data *sd;
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> sd = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
> - dev->next_sched = sd->output_queue;
> - sd->output_queue = dev;
> + txq->next_sched = sd->output_queue;
> + sd->output_queue = txq;
> raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> @@ -1912,7 +1913,7 @@ static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> }
>
> if (sd->output_queue) {
> - struct net_device *head;
> + struct netdev_queue *head;
>
> local_irq_disable();
> head = sd->output_queue;
> @@ -1920,12 +1921,10 @@ static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> local_irq_enable();
>
> while (head) {
> - struct net_device *dev = head;
> - struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq = head;
> + struct net_device *dev = txq->dev;
> head = head->next_sched;
>
> - txq = &dev->tx_queue;
> -
> smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
> clear_bit(__LINK_STATE_SCHED, &dev->state);
>
> @@ -4346,7 +4345,7 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> void *ocpu)
> {
> struct sk_buff **list_skb;
> - struct net_device **list_net;
> + struct netdev_queue **list_net;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> unsigned int cpu, oldcpu = (unsigned long)ocpu;
> struct softnet_data *sd, *oldsd;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 7:03 [PATCH 11/39]: netdev: Move next_sched into struct netdev_queue David Miller
2008-07-14 11:49 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-07-14 12:00 ` David Miller
2008-07-14 12:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080714114913.GA4504@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=Matheos.Worku@Sun.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinay@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox