From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: kaber@trash.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/31]: pkt_sched: Perform bulk of qdisc destruction in RCU.
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:36:09 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080717.153609.142867331.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487F4DA6.6010009@trash.net>
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:48:22 +0200
> One thought that occured to me - we could avoid all the visiblity
> issues wrt. dev->qdisc_list by simply getting rid of it :)
>
> If we move the qdisc list from the device to the root Qdisc itself,
> it would become invisible automatically as soon as we assign a new
> root qdisc to the netdev_queue. Iteration would become slightly
> more complicated since we'd have to iterate over all netdev_queues,
> but I think it should avoid most of the problems I mentioned
> (besides the u32_list thing).
What might make sense is to have a special Qdisc_root structure which
is simply:
struct Qdisc_root {
struct Qdisc qd;
struct list_head qdisc_list;
};
Everything about tree level synchronization would be type explicit.
Yes, as you say, the qdisc iteration would get slightly ugly. But
that doesn't seem to be a huge deal.
But it seems a clean solution to the child qdisc visibility problem.
About u32_list, that thing definitely needs some spinlock. The
consultation of that list, and refcount mods, only occur during config
operations. So it's not like we have to grab this lock in the data
paths.
If we really want to sweep this problem under the rug, there is another
way. Have the qdisc_destroy() RCU handler kick off a workqueue, and
grab the RTNL semaphore there during the final destruction calls. :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 12:17 [PATCH 20/31]: pkt_sched: Perform bulk of qdisc destruction in RCU David Miller
2008-07-17 13:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-17 13:12 ` David Miller
2008-07-17 13:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-17 22:36 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-07-17 23:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-17 13:35 ` jamal
2008-07-17 14:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-17 22:24 ` David Miller
2008-07-17 23:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-18 13:10 ` jamal
2008-07-18 13:27 ` jamal
2008-07-18 21:05 ` David Miller
2008-07-20 15:16 ` jamal
2008-07-20 17:25 ` David Miller
2008-07-20 17:34 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-07-20 17:35 ` David Miller
2008-07-20 22:32 ` jamal
2008-07-20 23:59 ` David Miller
2008-07-21 2:20 ` jamal
2008-07-21 11:20 ` jamal
2008-07-21 16:45 ` David Miller
2008-07-21 11:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 13:08 ` jamal
2008-07-21 13:19 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 13:56 ` jamal
2008-07-21 13:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 15:09 ` David Miller
2008-07-21 15:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 15:26 ` David Miller
2008-07-21 16:16 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 16:25 ` David Miller
2008-07-21 16:43 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 16:51 ` David Miller
2008-07-21 17:02 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 17:08 ` David Miller
2008-07-21 17:11 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-22 6:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-22 7:16 ` David Miller
2008-08-22 7:41 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-22 10:42 ` David Miller
2008-08-22 10:47 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-22 13:52 ` jamal
2008-08-22 13:43 ` jamal
2008-07-21 17:35 ` David Miller
2008-07-18 17:10 ` Roland Dreier
2008-07-20 14:58 ` jamal
2008-07-20 14:32 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-20 17:20 ` David Miller
2008-07-20 14:20 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-20 15:35 ` jamal
2008-07-21 0:11 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 2:33 ` jamal
2008-07-21 3:17 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 11:14 ` jamal
2008-07-21 11:36 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-21 11:39 ` jamal
2008-07-19 3:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080717.153609.142867331.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).