linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: add EPO lock to rfkill-input
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:44:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807232044.24531.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216775046-9506-5-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br>

On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Add software-based sanity to rfkill-input so that it can reproduce what
> hardware-based EPO switches do, and lock down any further attempts to
> UNBLOCK radios until the switch is deactivated.
> 
> This makes rfkill and rfkill-input extend the operation of an existing
> wireless master kill switch that issues EV_SW SW_RFKILL_ALL OFF events to
> all wireless devices in the system, even those that are not under hardware
> or firmware control.
> 
> Since this is the expected operational behaviour for the master switch, the
> EPO lock functionality is not optional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c |   46 +++++++++++++-------------------------------
>  net/rfkill/rfkill-input.h |    1 +
>  net/rfkill/rfkill.c       |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> index 273fb38..8e6781d 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ struct rfkill_task {
>  enum rfkill_global_sched_op {
>  	RFKILL_GLOBAL_OP_EPO = 0,
>  	RFKILL_GLOBAL_OP_RESTORE,
> +	RFKILL_GLOBAL_OP_UNLOCK,
> +	RFKILL_GLOBAL_OP_UNBLOCK,
>  };

As mentioned in the previous patch "rfkill: add master_switch_mode functionality"
the above 2 new enums aren't allowed because they are blocked in the module
init function.

>  static void rfkill_schedule_toggle(struct rfkill_task *task)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
> @@ -169,30 +161,19 @@ static DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK(rfkill_wlan, RFKILL_TYPE_WLAN);
>  static DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK(rfkill_bt, RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH);
>  static DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK(rfkill_uwb, RFKILL_TYPE_UWB);
>  static DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK(rfkill_wimax, RFKILL_TYPE_WIMAX);
> -static DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK(rfkill_wwan, RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN);

Are all RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN users gone?
In that case the define should disappear completely.

Ivo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-23 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-23  1:04 [GIT PATCH] RFC: next batch of rfkill changes Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23  1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: detect bogus double-registering Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23  3:41   ` Johannes Berg
2008-07-23 15:27     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 16:30       ` Johannes Berg
2008-07-23 17:41         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:12           ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23  1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: add default global states Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:28   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 18:42     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 19:20       ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23  1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: add master_switch_mode functionality Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:39   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 19:37     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23  1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: add EPO lock to rfkill-input Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:44   ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-07-23 19:01     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 19:28       ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23  1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: rename rfkill_mutex to rfkill_global_mutex Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:44   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23  1:04 ` [PATCH] rfkill: rate-limit rfkill-input workqueue usage Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:46   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 19:43     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-07-23 20:27       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 20:39         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-07-23  1:12 ` [GIT PATCH] RFC: next batch of rfkill changes Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-07-23 18:08 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-07-23 19:09   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-01 18:11 ` John W. Linville
2008-08-01 19:35   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807232044.24531.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
    --to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).