linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] rfkill: introduce RFKILL_STATE_MAX
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 10:06:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808031006.05210.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217700664-20792-5-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br>

On Saturday 02 August 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> While it is interesting to not add last-enum-markers because it allows gcc
> to warn us of switch() statements missing a valid state, we really should
> be handling memory corruption on a rfkill state with default clauses,
> anyway.
> 
> So add RFKILL_STATE_MAX and use it where applicable.  It makes for safer
> code in the long run.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> Cc: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/rfkill.h |    1 +
>  net/rfkill/rfkill.c    |   11 ++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rfkill.h b/include/linux/rfkill.h
> index e92d8e9..4cd64b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rfkill.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rfkill.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum rfkill_state {
>  	RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED = 0,	/* Radio output blocked */
>  	RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED    = 1,	/* Radio output allowed */
>  	RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED = 2,	/* Output blocked, non-overrideable */
> +	RFKILL_STATE_MAX,		/* marker for last valid state */
>  };
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> index 5320210..ea872e5 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ static int rfkill_toggle_radio(struct rfkill *rfkill,
>  		 * BLOCK even a transmitter that is already in state
>  		 * RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED */
>  		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (force || state != rfkill->state) {
> @@ -234,6 +236,9 @@ static void __rfkill_switch_all(const enum rfkill_type type,
>  {
>  	struct rfkill *rfkill;
>  
> +	if (unlikely(state >= RFKILL_STATE_MAX))
> +		return;
> +
>  	rfkill_global_states[type].current_state = state;
>  	list_for_each_entry(rfkill, &rfkill_list, node) {
>  		if ((!rfkill->user_claim) && (rfkill->type == type)) {
> @@ -329,9 +334,7 @@ int rfkill_force_state(struct rfkill *rfkill, enum rfkill_state state)
>  {
>  	enum rfkill_state oldstate;
>  
> -	if (state != RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED &&
> -	    state != RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED &&
> -	    state != RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED)
> +	if (unlikely(state >= RFKILL_STATE_MAX))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&rfkill->mutex);
> @@ -735,6 +738,8 @@ int __must_check rfkill_register(struct rfkill *rfkill)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	if (rfkill->type >= RFKILL_TYPE_MAX)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (rfkill->state >= RFKILL_STATE_MAX)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	snprintf(dev->bus_id, sizeof(dev->bus_id),
>  		 "rfkill%ld", (long)atomic_inc_return(&rfkill_no) - 1);



  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-03  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-02 18:10 [GIT PATCH] rfkill changes for 2.6.28, set 1 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] rfkill: detect bogus double-registering (v2) Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  8:04   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-02 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] rfkill: add default global states (v2) Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  8:05   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-02 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] rfkill: add __must_check annotations Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  8:05   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] rfkill: introduce RFKILL_STATE_MAX Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  8:06   ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-08-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] rfkill: add WARN_ON and BUG_ON paranoia Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  8:07   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-03  8:57     ` Johannes Berg
2008-08-03 10:07       ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-03 13:28         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03 13:53           ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-03 13:36             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03 13:21       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03 13:50         ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-03 18:12         ` Johannes Berg
2008-08-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] rfkill: use the new WARN() Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  8:10   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-03 13:32     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] rfkill: rename rfkill_mutex to rfkill_global_mutex Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 18:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] rfkill: add support for wake-on-wireless-packet Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 19:02   ` Johannes Berg
2008-08-02 19:27     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 21:21       ` Tomas Winkler
2008-08-03  3:55         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  6:03           ` Tomas Winkler
2008-08-03 13:52             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03 15:49               ` Tomas Winkler
2008-08-03 18:25                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03 22:36                   ` Tomas Winkler
2008-08-04  2:52                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03  8:12       ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-03  8:07         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-08-03 13:44           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-03 14:12             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-08-04 15:42       ` Dan Williams
2008-08-04 22:30         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-04 22:56           ` Dan Williams
2008-08-04 23:35             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-05  9:12               ` Johannes Berg
2008-08-05 12:48                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-05 12:50                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-08-05 12:59                     ` Johannes Berg
2008-08-05 20:44                       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-05 20:54                         ` Johannes Berg
2008-08-05 13:03               ` Dan Williams
2008-08-05 14:00                 ` John W. Linville
2008-08-05 18:37                   ` Ivo van Doorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808031006.05210.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
    --to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).