From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42843 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751608AbYHDV65 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:58:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080804.145855.230579810.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20080804_235914_289686_B3D48E44) To: marcel@holtmann.org Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1217886123.7819.23.camel@californication> References: <1217882288.7819.19.camel@californication> <20080804204558.GA5866@tuxdriver.com> <1217886123.7819.23.camel@californication> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Marcel Holtmann Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:42:03 +0200 > Hi John, > > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4): > > > > list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init() > > > > list.h: add list_cut_position() > > > > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it > > > in the commit message. > > > > Hmmm...no. I thought the original patches had been copied to > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case. > > > > The original patches are archived here: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2 > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2 > > > > What problems do you see with them? > > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs. Right.