From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rfkill: use strict_strtoul
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:31:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808172131.52721.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080817181617.GA30679@tuxdriver.com>
On Sunday 17 August 2008 20:16:17 John W. Linville wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 02:56:26PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Switch sysfs parsing to something that actually works properly.
>
> > @@ -402,7 +410,7 @@ static ssize_t rfkill_claim_store(struct device *dev,
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> > - if (rfkill->user_claim != claim) {
> > + if (!!rfkill->user_claim != !!claim) {
> > if (!claim) {
> > mutex_lock(&rfkill->mutex);
> > rfkill_toggle_radio(rfkill,
>
> This looks a bit funny. Is the '!!' in front of 'rfkill->user_claim'
> really necessary? Especially since...
You can remove the !! in front of rfkill->user_claim, because rfkill->user_claim
is bool anyway. The compiler will implicitely apply !! to it where it is needed.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-17 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-02 17:56 [GIT PATCH] rfkill fixes, set 3 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] rfkill: protect suspended rfkill controllers Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 18:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-02 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] rfkill: use strict_strtoul Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-08-02 18:25 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-08-17 18:16 ` John W. Linville
2008-08-17 19:31 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2008-08-19 21:53 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808172131.52721.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).