From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Jan-Espen Pettersen <sigsegv@radiotube.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: new: regression iwl3945/mac80211 endless after suspend associate/deassociate loop
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:50:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080902205022.GA8230@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080902172409.GJ17345@jm.kir.nu>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:24:09PM +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:10:38AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 17:58 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 09:30:01AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:04 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:10:09AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > > > "by local choice" means wext requested this, not a kernel bug.
>
> Well.. The disassociation part not, but what is trickering that
> (association/authentication timeout) may still be ;-).
>
>
> > > I put up a (sanitized) -dd output here
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
>
> Would it be possible to get unsanitized version and with -t (i.e.,
> timestamps)? If you don't want to post it publicly, feel free to send
> one directly to me. The one attached to that bug removed quite a bit of
> information that would have been useful in figuring out what happened.
Could you tell me which bits are needed, and don't include
security info? I wouldn't want to post the PSK, etc.
> > Logs seem to indicate a normal failure of the 4 way handshake; are you
> > sure your PSK is correct? It actually looks like the AP doesn't ever
> > get message #2 from your machine, and just retransmits message #1 of the
> > handshake. I'm pretty sure that if
> > 8ab65b03b7893da4a49009e7e356e36e27b0c407 had anything to do with it, you
> > wouldn't be getting this far and the AP would have denied association in
> > the first place.
>
> There are more than one different types of issues shown in the log. I'm
> not sure which one would be the key one here. Anyway, I would agree that
> the commit that removed an empty ext. supp rates IE has nothing to do
> with this.
>
>
> As far as suspend is concerned, which distro is used here?
ubuntu gutsy
> Does it
> unload the driver (i.e., remove the netdev) on suspend? If yes, you will
> need to update wpa_supplicant 0.6.4 which handles that disappearing and
> reappearing interface.
Hmm, since it manages to reassociate with -rc4 I would guess not.
In any case killing wpa_supplicant after reboot and restarting it does not
seem to help.
> If this is something else, I would need to get
> more complete debug log from wpa_supplicant..
>
> --
> Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-02 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-01 16:07 new: regression iwl3945/mac80211 endless after suspend associate/deassociate loop Michael S. Tsirkin
2008-09-02 1:38 ` Zhu Yi
2008-09-02 6:10 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-02 13:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2008-09-02 13:30 ` Dan Williams
2008-09-02 14:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2008-09-02 15:06 ` John W. Linville
2008-09-02 20:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2008-09-02 15:10 ` Dan Williams
2008-09-02 17:24 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-09-02 20:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2008-09-03 12:07 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-09-02 13:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2008-09-02 13:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080902205022.GA8230@google.com \
--to=m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sigsegv@radiotube.org \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).